Two Opposing Forces and Velocity

AI Thread Summary
In a crane mechanism lifting a 0.25 kg object with a pulling force of 100 Newtons, the discussion revolves around calculating the object's velocity. The motor's linear velocity is determined to be 10.6029 cm/s, but questions arise regarding the actual lifting speed under load conditions. It is clarified that if the lifting speed is constant, the net force would be zero, indicating that the pulling force equals the weight of the object. Concerns about the motor's performance under load suggest that it may slow down, and the calculations assume ideal conditions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering real-world factors like motor characteristics and efficiency in practical applications.
Frankyyyyy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In a crane like mechanism, a 0.25 Kg object is lifted with a pulling force of 100 Newtons. Neglecting friction, find the velocity of the object being lifted.

ma = F
0.25kg*9.81m/s2 = 2.45N

F1 = 100N
F2 = 2.45N

My problem here is getting the velocity. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Frank, and welcome to PF :)

Unfortunately, help is to no avail in this situation. Either the problem itself, or your rendering of it, lacks the information to find the velocity. You sure this is the exercise, the whole exercise, and nothing but the exercise ? :) again...
 
Hello BvU

Sorry if my the problem was lacking data. And yes I made it myself. :P

It's actually for my scaled crane project, I was thinking of making a document that will compare the actual and theoretical data to obtain my crane's efficiency.

What more data should I add to be able to solve the velocity? Well my motor's linear velocity is 10.6029cm/s, say that the hanging object is to travel 45cm.

Extra**

Correct me if I'm wrong, this is how I solved for the motor's linear velocity:
Motor Specs (90rpm, 6V, 2.4A), Pulley diameter is 2.25cm

ω = 90rpm * 2π rad/rev
ω = 180π rad/min

Velocity = ω * (radius of pulley)
V = 180π * 1.125cm
V (converted minutes to seconds) = 10.6029 cm/s
 
So if the pulley pulls in 11 cm of 'cable' per second, doesn't the load move upwards at 11 cm/s too ?

However, there are a few more things to consider:
Motor speed: is this 90 rpm under free running conditions, or is it under full load ?
And the 100 N: where does that come from ? Again: free running or full load ?

As you calculated, the 100 N is more than enough to lift the 0.25 kg load.

Have you learned about Newton's law already ? Fnet = ma ? if the lifting speed is constant (for example this 11 cm/s), then the acceleration is zero, so the net force is zero too: the pulling force and the weight should then be equal (both 2.45 N, in opposite directions).

As you see: ask a physicist a question and he homes back with no answer and a lot more questions :)
 
Yes the linear velocity of the motor is 11 cm/s, but isn't it going to slow down since the motor is pulling 250 grams? That's what I've been trying to figure out. :confused:

Yes 90rpm is under free running condition.

It's actually 136 N to be exact, I just rounded it off, obtained from using the Power (Horsepower) = (Tq * Rpm)/5252 formula using 6 volts and 2400ma, those are 4 AA batteries in series. :p Then used the Torque = Force*Radius formula. And I got 136 N, free running condition as well. :)

Yes I've been there, the equilibrium law..
 
Ah, now I see. Stick to SI units if you can: 6V * 2.4 A = 14.4 W. And 14.4W/0.106 m/s is about 136 N.

The batteries won't provide 1.5 V at 2.4 A (and definitely not for a long time...)
There's loss in the wires, in the motor, in the pulleys, ...
I think even your original 100 N is optimistic... but fortunately you only need 2.5, so there's a margin.

Motor is going to slow down under load. How much depends on its characateristics (google "motor characteristics", or "torque rpm"). But much better: try it out !

Or leave it all and consider these calculations are for the ideal situation
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top