Understanding Angular Momentum in Particle Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of statements regarding angular momentum in particle motion. It is noted that the angular momentum of a moving particle is indeed dependent on the chosen origin for calculations. The second statement is challenged, as zero torque implies constant angular momentum, not necessarily zero. The third statement is debated, with the argument that constant speed does not guarantee constant angular momentum if the point of reference changes. The fourth statement is affirmed, as a planet in circular motion cannot have zero total angular momentum despite its spin. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of angular momentum and its dependence on various factors.
sumitmanhas
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Which of the following is an accurate statement
1) The angular momentum of a moving particle depends on the specific origin with respect to which the angular momentum is calculated.
2) If the torque acting on a particle is zero about an arbitrary origin, then the angular momentum of the particle is also zero about that origin.
3) If the speed of a particle is constant, then the angular momentum of the particle about any specific origin must also be constant.
4) Consider a planet moving in a circular orbit about a star. Even if the planet is spinning it is not possible for its total angular momentum to be zero.
5) A particle moving in a straight line with constant speed necessarily has zero angular momentum.





Homework Equations


conservation of angular momentum and principles


The Attempt at a Solution


i am not sure whether which one is more accurate among 3,4 , could someone lead me on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps if you could give us your reasoning for each answer we can understand your difficulty. I can see some fairly firm objections to both 3 and 4.
 
so for the first 1 ) this is likely to be true , which i never thought of because evrytime you calculate your angular momentum you choose the point of rotation and from there using right hand rule determine the direction (in or out)
2) makes no sense because if there is no torque acting on the origin then the angular momentum is constant
3) if speed is constant then angular momentum = mrv is same since the mass remain the same throughout
4)if an object keeps rotating doesn't it have an initial momentum and final momentum which are same , so, i mean it is constant then.
5) particle in straight line can have angular momentum , as in the case of a person jumping of the merry go round with horizontal speed doesnot have zero angular momentum.

reply as soon as possible please
 
Last edited:
i believe the first one is more accurate...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top