Understanding the Ideal Gas Law: State Changes and Work Calculation | Geocities

willydavidjr
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
The diagram below shows state changes of an ideal gas. The temperature of states (1), (2), (3) are T_1[K], T_2[K] and T_3[K] respectively. The state change from (1) to (2) is an adiabatic change (not an isothermal change). The state change from (2) to (3) is a change at constant pressure (isobaric change). The state change from (3) to (1) is a change at constant volume (isochoric change).

Question: 1.) Write the size relation between T_1, T_2, T_3.

2.) Let the quantity of the ideal gas be 1[mol] and let R[J/mol*K] denote the gas constant. Find the work which the gas did on the outside during the state change from (2) to (3).

My idea:
For number 1: If I will write the relation between the 3 Temperatures, I will follow the Ideal gas law PV=nKT. But n and K can be disable because it will act as a constant and it is the same gas used. So am I correct if I say T_1 < T_2 < T_3. Or it looks like T_1 > T_2 What do you say?


For number 2:
Is there work done for the gas outside during the state change?


Note: You can view the diagram on this website : http://www.geocities.com/willydavidjr/pvdiagram
 

Attachments

  • pressure.jpg
    pressure.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 387
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
willydavidjr said:
Question: 1.) Write the size relation between T_1, T_2, T_3.

For number 1: If I will write the relation between the 3 Temperatures, I will follow the Ideal gas law PV=nKT. But n and K can be disable because it will act as a constant and it is the same gas used. So am I correct if I say T_1 < T_2 < T_3. Or it looks like T_1 > T_2 What do you say?

I agree with you that T_3 is the biggest one. To correctly order T_1 and T_2 you should note that for adiabatic processes, VT^{\alpha}=constant.

2.) Let the quantity of the ideal gas be 1[mol] and let R[J/mol*K] denote the gas constant. Find the work which the gas did on the outside during the state change from (2) to (3).

My idea:
For number 1: If I will write the relation between the 3 Temperatures, I will follow the Ideal gas law PV=nKT. But n and K can be disable because it will act as a constant and it is the same gas used. So am I correct if I say T_1 < T_2 < T_3. Or it looks like T_1 > T_2 What do you say?

There has to be, because the gas is expanding. What's the definition of work in terms of pressure and volume?
 
Wait a minute Tom Mattson, I think we're wrong. The question number asked about the size relation. Are they talking about the volume or the amount of Temperatures? And on question number two, how can I find the work done(W=PV) if the given only is the number of moles and R constant?Thank you.
 
Willy,

I have no idea of what the "size relation" is. That term certainly isn't standard. I assumed that you knew what it meant, and so I took your word for it that it was an inequality involving the temperatures. If it is something else then you should say so.
 
Ok thank you, I am sorry because that was the same sentence I have here, maybe its an inequality involving temperatures.

How about "Let the quantity of the ideal gas be 1[mol] and let R[J/mol*K] denote the gas constant. Find the work which the gas did on the outside during the state change from (2) to (3)."?

My problem about this is that the given are n and R. We have no detail for the P,V,T to get the Work=PV...How can I solve it?
 
It seems that T1 and T2 are uqual?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top