Uniform Electric Field and Finding Electric Potential

AI Thread Summary
In a uniform electric field of 5.5 × 10^3 N/C directed along the positive x-axis, the electric potential at the origin is 0V. To find the potential at the point (10 cm, 10 cm), the relationship V = Ed is used, leading to a calculated potential of -550 V. This negative value arises because the potential decreases as a positive charge moves in the direction of the electric field. The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between electric field strength, potential difference, and the direction of charge movement. Overall, the key takeaway is that potential energy decreases when moving with the electric field.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



7) A uniform electric field of magnitude of E=5.5 ×10^3 N/C points in the positive x axis
direction. The electric potential at the origin (x,y)=(0,0) of the xy-coordinate system is 0V. Find the electric potential at the point (x,y)=(10.0 cm, 10.0 cm).

A) -777.8 V
B) 777.8 V
C) 550 V
D) -550 V
E) 1100 V

Homework Equations



E = kq/r^2
V = kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought I would have to find the charge (even though it does not mention any point charges) at (10,10).

5.5*10^3 N/C = (8.99*10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(q1)
---------------------------
(0.10)^2

q1 = 6.1179*10^-9 C

Then I thought "Oh...well I'm assuming this is the charge at (10,10)."

V = (8.99*10^9 Nm^2/C^2)(6.1179*10^-9C) / (200^.5) = 3.813 V
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine two vertical plates of a parallel-plate capacitor positioned along the x-axis. If the plates are 1m apart, then the potential between them is 5.5x10^3 volts (to fit the specs given).

With this setup, what is the potential at a point 10cm in from one plate and 10cm off the axis?

(You can use various equations to show that the units of N/C are equivalent to V/m, both being the measure of electric field strength.)
 
It's fine to find your charge first, but it's not strictly necessary, you can continue to manipulate equations until you're ready to solve for the final answer (which in almost every case saves you time).

That said, you're on the right track, didn't check everything, but I noticed it seems you're using two different values for r. When you solved for q you used r=0.1 and when you solved for V you used r= sqrt(200).
 
Hi NascentOxygen - I talked to my professor today and he said the potential at that point (10 cm, 10 cm) is 5.5*10^3 N/C because it lies in the same direction as the electric field.

He also suggest I use: V = Ed

V = 5.5*10^3 N/c (0.10 m) = -550 V

I forgot why he told me the answer is negative, though. I don't seem to understand that part, especially since it is in the same direction as the electric potential.
 
You can sub in q = (E*r^2)/k into v = kq/r to get V=Er but even simpler is to just look at the units. You're asked for V which is joules per coulomb. You're given N/C and a distance. How can you make N/C into J/C ? A joule is simply a Newton x distance (recall work = force * distance for example). So now you know instinctively so to speak that your equation is V=Er. That is to say J/C = N/C * distance.

So what about the positive and negative, how can you tell? Well ask yourself what is a potential difference? It's the energy required to move that charge from point A to point B. Which is point A? The one you start at. How do you know the origin is point A? Because it says V=0 at (0,0).

Think of it in terms of gravity. Water at the top of a mountain has lots of stored potential energy... it may fall through a turbine and do work for us. In terms of this question, the charge "falls" through the electric field from A to B, and as it falls, it loses its potential energy. So use a negative sign. When charges "fall" though a circuit from a high potential to a low potential, they power our electronics :).

With the field -> loss of potential energy.
Against the field -> gaining potential energy.
 
Last edited:
PeachBanana said:
I forgot why he told me the answer is negative, though. I don't seem to understand that part, especially since it is in the same direction as the electric potential.
The direction of an electric field is the direction that a unit positive charge would move under the influence of that field. Being positively charged, it moves away from the positive electrode towards the negative. Use this information, together with the details you are given for the direction of the field, and the voltage, to determine polarity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top