Water flow down a porous channel (Navier-Stokes/Fluid dynamics)

tome101
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Water flows down a channel whose floor is porous, so that water seeps out of the bottom of the channel at a speed v, where v is constant and much less than the flow speed, U, along the surface of the channel. The seepage rate is slow so that H may be regarded as constant.

The x−component of the Navier-Stokes equation for such a system is

\nu\frac{d^{2}u}{dy^{2}}+v\frac{du}{dy}+G=0

where G is a constant.

Verify (i.e. no need to derive) that the general solution of this equation is

u=A-\frac{G}{v}y+Be^{-vy/\nu}

where A and B are integration constants.
State clearly what the boundary conditions are that determine A, B and G, and verify that the required solution is:

u*=\frac{1-Re^{-R}y*-e^{-Ry*}}{1-(R+1)e^{-R}}

where u = Uu*, y = Hy* and R = vH/\nu.

Homework Equations


u(0)=0

u(H)=U


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I managed the first part and have verified that the 2nd equation is indeed a solution of the first. However, I am having trouble removing the integration constants and G and rearranging to the required equation.

I know that at the top of the channel, u=U so u(H)=U. I'm also assuming that since v is 'much less' than the flow speed we can assum that at the bottom of the path the horizontal flow speed is equivalent to 0 (although I am less sure about this).

So that gives boundary conditions of:
u(H)=0
u(0)=0

Using u(0)=0 I can see that A+B=0

I can get an equation for U by using u(H).

However, I can't seem to find any useful way of rearranging these equations to a) remove A B and G or b) look anything like the final equation... I am also not 100% certain my boundary conditions are corect. Attached is a diagam of the problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 484
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
290 views and no-one has any thoughts on this? I'm still completely stumped! I've also just noticed i should say u(H)=U under the attempted solution
 
Last edited:
I'm not very familiar with fluid dynamics at all, but here are some thoughts:

Since you have three constants to eliminate, you'll need three equations. Your boundary conditions only give you two. You need to get one more constraint from somewhere.

The condition u(0)=0 is correct — you can see this by setting y*=0 in the provided solution — but your reason for it is wrong. It doesn't have to do with the seepage rate. It's the no-slip condition. The water doesn't slide along the channel floor.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top