What Causes the Difference Between Calculated and Experimental Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancy between calculated and experimental acceleration in a physics lab involving a car and weights. Key factors contributing to this difference include friction, which affects net force, and potential inaccuracies in timing measurements, despite using an electronic device. Human reaction time, although not the primary focus, could also influence timing if manual measurements were involved. The conversation emphasizes that while theoretical calculations assume ideal conditions, real-world experiments often yield variations due to these factors. Understanding these elements is crucial for accurately interpreting experimental results in physics.
Ninjarzz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So we did a lab this week in my physics class.

We had a car on a horizontal table, that was attached to a string with weights (The weights were over the edge of the table.) We then calculated the experimental acceleration and the calculated acceleration. These numbers were different.

My teacher asked us "What was causing the difference between the calculated acceleration and experimental acceleration..."
He also mentioned something to do with Newton's laws.

Do you know the answer/Can help me out?

HUMAN ERROR IS NOT THE ANSWER...And the the time was taken by a electronic device.

Homework Equations



g = 9.8 m/s

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know how to start! what's causing the difference!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction, human reaction time. F = d(mv)/dt

Since friction affects net force, reaction affects time, one wouldn't expect to get the exact answer..
 
unscientific said:
Friction, human reaction time. F = d(mv)/dt

Since friction affects net force, reaction affects time, one wouldn't expect to get the exact answer..

I'm not really sure what you mean by human reaction time?

Elaborate? like ... the time that i calculated forit to go? because it was takeen by a stop watch
 
ok, human has a reaction time of about 0.19s. Which means you could have pressed the time too late, which means the time u measure is more than the the theoretically calculated time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top