What is the Electric Field at Point P Due to a Uniformly Charged Rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P due to a uniformly charged rod, specifically a positive charge of 7.81 pC distributed along a rod of length 0.145 m, positioned 0.06 m above the center of the rod. The electric field equation used is E = (1/4πε)(q/r²), and the integral for the electric field was incorrectly evaluated initially, leading to a result of 7.48 N/C instead of the correct value of 12.4 N/C. The error was identified as stemming from improper integration and the need for trigonometric substitutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and substitutions
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution and linear charge density (λ)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about trigonometric substitutions in integral calculus
  • Explore the concept of linear charge density (λ) and its applications
  • Review the principles of electric field superposition for multiple charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charge distributions.

glennpagano44
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Halliday and Resnick edition 7 chapter 22 number 29

In Fig 22-45, positive charge q = 7.81 pC is spread uniformly along a thin nonconducting rod of length L = .145m. The y distance between the point and rod is R = .06m. What is the magnitude and direction of the electric field produced at point P.

I will attempt to describe the figure:

There is a thin nonconducting rod in the x dimension with length L and a point P is directly above the center of the rod in the y dimension (R = .06m).

Homework Equations



E = (1/4\pi\epsilon)(q/r^{2})

The Attempt at a Solution



\intdE = 1/4\pi\epsilon\int\lambdaRdx/(R^{2}+x^{2})^{3/2}
I then took lamba and R out of the integral since they are constants
(4 is not rasied to (\pi\epsilon)

After taking the integral I got:

(\lambda/4\pi\epsilon)(x/R(R^{2}+x^{2})^{1/2}

When I plug in for the varibles I do not get the correct answer, I get 7.48 n/C but the correct answer is 12.4 N/C

I plug in L for x and R for R and for \lambda I use q/L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi glennpagano44! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ and an epsilon: ε and a pi: π and a square-root: √ :wink:)
glennpagano44 said:
After taking the integral I got:

(\lambda/4\pi\epsilon)(x/R(R^{2}+x^{2})^{1/2}

No … how can you still have an x when you've just eliminated x by integrating over it?

And where did that extra R come from? :confused:
 
I went back to class today and I figured it out thanks a lot. I just integrated it wrong, I had to do some trig subsitutions. (that is where the extra R came from)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K