What is the final speed of a proton in an electric field after traveling 2.0 mm?

AI Thread Summary
A proton in a uniform electric field of 2.3*10^3 N/C starts with an initial speed of 2.1*10^4 m/s and travels 2.0 mm. To find the final speed, one can use the force equation F=qE, where the charge of the proton is known. The discussion emphasizes using the work-energy theorem instead of gravitational potential energy, as the relevant energy change is due to electrostatic potential energy. The work done by the electric field on the proton over the distance traveled must be calculated to determine the final speed. Understanding these principles will lead to the correct solution for the proton's final speed.
spoonthrower
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
A uniform electric field has a magnitude of 2.3*10^3 N/C. In a vacuum, a proton begins with a speed of 2.1*10^4 m/s and moves in the direction of this field. Find the speed of the proton after it has moved a distance of 2.0 mm please help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts on it?
 
i know F=qE, so is there a value of q for a proton that i don't know about. once i know the force i guess i need to find the acceleration to calculate the final speed. so i would need the mass of a proton?
 
Yeah, you need the mass and charge of the proton (which you can look up anywhere). So now you know F (which is constant) and it's just a classical mechanics exercise, analogous to a particle in a uniform gravitational field.

It is more efficient to use an energy approach though. The potential energy lost in moving the 2mm is gained by the kinetic energy of the proton.
 
so I would use .5mvf^2-.5mvo^2=mgh

The mass cancels i know that. I use gravity?

I am still getting the wrong answer
 
spoonthrower said:
so I would use .5mvf^2-.5mvo^2=mgh

The mass cancels i know that. I use gravity?
No! The only thing analogous is that the force acting on the particle is constant. You mustn't use gravitational potential energy (which is proportional to the mass) but electrostatic potential energy (Which is proportional to the charge). I made the analogy to simplify the view on the problem, but I see it's only confusing. Forget I said the whole thing!

If you don't know electrostatic potential energy, just use the work-energy theorem. What is the work done by the field in moving the particle those 2mm?
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top