What is the Maximum Height a Rolling Marble Reaches on a Rough Hill?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height a solid uniform marble reaches when rolling up a rough hill without slipping. The conservation of energy principle is applied, leading to the equation v0^2 = 10gh/7. Participants suggest rearranging this equation to solve for height, emphasizing that the final height should not depend on the initial speed v0. There is confusion regarding the requirement for a specific height in meters, as the computer system rejects answers that include v0. Clarification is sought on whether additional information from the problem statement is missing.
raiderIV
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid uniform marble is rolling without slipping when it approaches the base of a hill with a speed v0.

Find the maximum height above the base that this marble will reach if the hill is rough enough to prevent slipping.


Homework Equations


Since there is no slipping I can use the conservation of energy

mgh = .5mv2 + .5Iw2

and i end up with the equation

v02 = 10gh/7


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to go from here, so if someone might be willing to give me a point in the correct direction, it would be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
raiderIV said:

Homework Statement


A solid uniform marble is rolling without slipping when it approaches the base of a hill with a speed v0.

Find the maximum height above the base that this marble will reach if the hill is rough enough to prevent slipping.


Homework Equations


Since there is no slipping I can use the conservation of energy

mgh = .5mv2 + .5Iw2

and i end up with the equation

v02 = 10gh/7


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to go from here, so if someone might be willing to give me a point in the correct direction, it would be most appreciated.

You seem pretty much done. You equated the final PE with the initial total KE (linear and rotational), and the final PE has the final height in it that you are asked to solve for. Just re-arrange your final equation.


EDIT -- actually I'm not sure I understand your final equation. You can eliminate the I in the initial equation by using the definition of a sphere's I in terms of its mass and radius. It does seem like your final answer will still have variables in it for m, R and Vo.
 
berkeman said:
You seem pretty much done. You equated the final PE with the initial total KE (linear and rotational), and the final PE has the final height in it that you are asked to solve for. Just re-arrange your final equation.EDIT -- actually I'm not sure I understand your final equation. You can eliminate the I in the initial equation by using the definition of a sphere's I in terms of its mass and radius. It does seem like your final answer will still have variables in it for m, R and Vo.
The problem is, that the final solution is asking for a set height in meters. I tried plugging in 9.81 for gravity and solving for h and leaving v0 in there, but to no avail (Its a computer system that i need to input the answers to, and it just tells me that the answer does not use v0 in it). I just don't know if there is someway to find h other than what i am aware of.
 
raiderIV said:
The problem is, that the final solution is asking for a set height in meters. I tried plugging in 9.81 for gravity and solving for h and leaving v0 in there, but to no avail (Its a computer system that i need to input the answers to, and it just tells me that the answer does not use v0 in it). I just don't know if there is someway to find h other than what i am aware of.

The final height will depend on Vo. Right? Maybe not on the mass, but for sure on the Vo. What are you not posting about the original problem statement?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top