What Is the Minimum Energy Required for Proton-Antiproton Pair Production?

Hertz
Messages
180
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



How much photon energy would be required to produce a proton-antiproton pair? Where could such a
high-energy photon come from?

Homework Equations



E^{2} = (pc)^{2} + (E_{0})^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the photon is massless its energy is
E_{i}=pc

The final energy is:
E_{f}^{2}=(pc)^{2}+(2m_{+}c^{2})^2

and we know that energy and momentum are conserved, so:
E_{i}^{2}=E_{f}^{2}
(pc)^{2} = (pc)^{2}+(2m_{+}c^{2})^2

but clearly, the mass of a photon is not zero, so how can this be?

edit-

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Please.. Can someone fix this? This gets added at the end of my post every time I preview post. It has been doing this for years...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need at least twice the mass of the proton, and this must be delivered within a small area and a small time.

For example, we can easily make electron-positron pairs with an ultrafast laser (20 fs pulses) whose average power is less than a watt, and generates a thousand pulses per second. Thus each pulse has a milli-Joule of energy, but by using a focus-correcting scheme it can all be put into a tiny area in a very brief time. Smash this into a gas or a solid target to get the energy out of the light pulse, and you will find electron positron pairs.

If you use a bigger laser, you can get proton-anti-proton pairs.

See http://cuos.engin.umich.edu/researchgroups/hfs/facilities/hercules-petawatt-laser/
 
UltrafastPED said:
For example, we can easily make electron-positron pairs with an ultrafast laser (20 fs pulses) whose average power is less than a watt, and generates a thousand pulses per second.

Oh ok, this question is asking about a single photon though, not a thousand photons per second.

UltrafastPED said:
Smash this into a gas or a solid target to get the energy out of the light pulse, and you will find electron positron pairs.

If you use a bigger laser, you can get proton-anti-proton pairs.

So you're saying that in order for pair production to happen, the photon must collide into something and lose its momentum? Is it fair to say that momentum can be completely lost during the collision and two particles at rest can be created? Would this be the mimimum photon energy necessary for pair production to happen? If so, I think that answers my question and I can solve this problem.
 
If your particle has a rest mass of 2 GeV/c^2 you will need a photon of double that energy.

If you don't cancel all of the momentum then you will need more to offset it ... photons also have momentum.

Thus it is better to hit a solid target, or else you need to bring two photons head-to-head, but you also need a moderator because photons don't interact at that energy level.

And conceptually there is no difference between one giant photon and a million small ones seen at the same time ... they both deliver the energy at the same rate, and in the same volume. Thus if I send a bunch of 1.5 eV photons (800 nm, near infrared) at a metal film with a 4.5 eV work function ... why I will get multi-photon absorption, and yes, I will get photo-electrons.

This is well documented, and I have also done it myself. My lab mates have created the electron-positron pairs, and the lab across the hall (Hercules) has generated proton beams, transmuted elements, etc ... all with a table-top laser ... its a big table, but it does fit in one room.
 
Hertz said:

Homework Statement



How much photon energy would be required to produce a proton-antiproton pair? Where could such a
high-energy photon come from?

Homework Equations



E^{2} = (pc)^{2} + (E_{0})^{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the photon is massless its energy is
E_{i}=pc
Where ##p## is the momentum of the photon.

The final energy is:
E_{f}^{2}=(pc)^{2}+(2m_{+}c^{2})^2
What does ##p## represent here? It's not the momentum of the photon.

and we know that energy and momentum are conserved, so:
E_{i}^{2}=E_{f}^{2}
(pc)^{2} = (pc)^{2}+(2m_{+}c^{2})^2

but clearly, the mass of a photon is not zero, so how can this be?


Hertz said:
So you're saying that in order for pair production to happen, the photon must collide into something and lose its momentum? Is it fair to say that momentum can be completely lost during the collision and two particles at rest can be created? Would this be the mimimum photon energy necessary for pair production to happen? If so, I think that answers my question and I can solve this problem.
An isolated photon cannot pair produce because you can't conserve both energy and momentum. Think about the reverse process, proton-anti proton annihilation. In the center of mass frame, the total momentum initially is zero, but if the annihilation produced only one photon, there would be a non-zero total momentum afterward. There has to be another photon produced to conserve momentum.

With pair production, the second photon is typically a virtual photon exchanged with a nearby nucleus. The nucleus ends up absorbing the extra momentum without taking much energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top