What is the Point of Rotation in a Rigid Body's Motion?

naestibill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Considering the concepts of Rigid Body/Angular Momentum/Torque
A body rotating with respect to an axis that passes through ANY point P, whose acceleration could be different to zero.

Prove:

Ʃτ(ext, p) = dL(rel_p)/dt + ρ(cm) x Ma(p)
Ʃτ(ext, p) = dL(rel_cm)/dt + ρ(cm) x Ma(cm)


Homework Equations



T = dL/dt
L = Ʃ ρ x mv

The Attempt at a Solution


Considering a Rigid Body/Angular Momentum/Torque

We know that Torque(ext) = dL/dt

Now with respect to stationary point S:
L(s, cm) = Ʃ(ρi x mivi)
and that dL(cm)/dt = Ʃτ(ext, CM)

Now with respect to ANY point, P, that is accelerating:
L(s,p) = L(cm) + ρ(cm) x Mv(cm)

after this I don't know how to prove what they are asking me for
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The motion of a rigid body can be described as a combination of linear translation/acceleraion of some point plus a rotation/rotational acceleration about an axis passing through that point. So what is that "some point"? It can be any point whatsoever -- and that is what you are being asked to prove.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top