Why are the colours of nebulae different?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mekon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The colors of nebulae differ due to the chemical composition of gas clouds and the emission frequencies of illumination sources. Human eyes struggle to detect color in low light, making nebulae appear gray through telescopes. Photography can capture light frequencies that are not visible to the naked eye, revealing vibrant colors. Close proximity to a nebula would not replicate the vivid hues seen in Hubble images, as these images often use false color techniques with narrowband filters. The colors in these images correspond to specific emissions from elements like Sulfur, Hydrogen, and Oxygen, which are assigned distinct colors for visualization.
Mekon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When I view the Orion Nebula through my telescope it appears a grey (US 'gray') cloud. When I take a time exposure photograph I can see purple and and green clouds.
1. Why is it different?
2. If i were in a spaceship and much closer, would I see the colours one sees in the beautiful Hubble images?

TIA
Mekon
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Two answers: chemical composition of the gas clouds and emission frequency of illumination sources. Photography reveals light frequencies inaccessible to the human eye.
 
Almost all nebulae are gray in the eyepiece due to the human eye being unable to detect color in such low light levels. Even going close would not look quite like the Hubble images. They simply don't put out that much light.

Also, many of the images seen where there are very bright distinct colors are false color images. These are taken through narrowband filters designed to isolate a very small wavelength range and are then assigned a specific color in the final image. For example, the Hubble typically uses Red for Sulfur emissions, Green for Hydrogen, and Blue for Oxygen. However both Sulfur and Hydrogen emit their light in the Red area of the spectrum, while Oxygen emits it's light in between green and blue.
 
Thanks for both replies. :)
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top