Why Does a More Viscous Liquid in a Can Allow It to Roll Further Down a Ramp?

AI Thread Summary
Can B, containing a more viscous fluid, rolls further down a ramp than Can A, despite Can A accelerating faster. This phenomenon is attributed to the distribution of kinetic energy, where Can A has higher linear kinetic energy while Can B exhibits greater angular kinetic energy due to its viscous fluid rolling with the can. The discussion also highlights the energy pathways involved, including gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, and energy losses from friction and drag. The group seeks feedback on their theory and how to effectively demonstrate energy loss and gain through data in their experiments. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the effects of fluid viscosity on rolling motion.
Solaxys
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given two cans to roll down a 1m ramp at angle 15 degrees [and then at 30 degrees for a check].
Can A has a less viscous fluid, broth.
Can B has a more viscous fluid, cream of mushroom soup.

Now through constant experimentation we find that, can B rolls down the ramp and ends up further than A, even though A accelerates much faster than B down the ramp.
Why?
And, what is the pathway of energy [where energy goes from X to 0, where X is the initial energy of both cans at the top of the ramp]

Homework Equations


GPE : mgh
Linear KE: 0.5mv^2
Angular KE: 0.5Iw^2
[Whatever else applies]

The Attempt at a Solution


For the why, a theory is devised:
Neglecting friction, and gravitational force due to the can's having the same mass, and the liquid's mass having a difference of less than 1%, we look into just the Kinetic energies.

We can choose two extremes to represent the viscosity: water[A] and honey.
Therefore, since this is a blackbody problem we can only assume, that the liquid in A remains at the bottom and thus linear. However, the liquid in B is more viscous, therefore it rolls with the can to a certain extent, or at least more than the low visous water.

This means, by the end of the ramp, we can assume that A has more linear kinetic energy, while B has more angular kinetic energy, for the reasons above.

And through various trials, it was seen that linear kinetic energy is easier to diminish than angular kinetic energy. Therefore, Can B rolls further than Can A, even though Can A moves faster down the ramp.

This is a theory, and we [my lab group and I] could use some feedback/comments/questions/concerns/la di da.


As for the energy pathway.
We don't want to draw the entire thing here, but just raise some points.
Firstly, the energies we see affecting the cans are:
Potential Energy [Gravitational], Kinetic Energy, Energy Loss due to Friction, Energy Loss due to Drag.
Is there any other energy we are missing?

Any ideas how we can show, via data, how these are lost/spent/gained throughout the lab?


Thank you for your help =).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top