Analyzing Simple Harmonic Motion in a Bifilar Pendulum Experiment

AI Thread Summary
To analyze simple harmonic motion in a bifilar pendulum experiment, measure the time for multiple oscillations and the distance of the rod. Plotting the time against the inverse of the distance will help establish a relationship. The gradient of this graph can be used to derive equations linking acceleration to either velocity or displacement. Computing potential energy as a function of angular displacement may also be beneficial, particularly if it shows a quadratic relationship for small angles. This approach will help confirm that the motion is indeed simple harmonic.
infinit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please give me an overview of how I get from measuring the time taken for x oscillations and the distance of the rod, to proving it moves with simple harmonic motion? I know i have to plot t--d^-1 on a graph, then using the gradient (td) i need to do some maths magic to get either an equation linking acceleration to velocity or displacement (to prove the motion is simple harmonic).

the setup is like this http://www.egglescliffe.org.uk/physics/gravitation/bifilar/Image7.gif but i don't understand the rest of the experiment he has done...

thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please... ?
 
I think you could try to compute the potential energy as a function of the angular displacement. You simply (...well, I didn't try it, I don't know how simple it is) have to find the height of the center of mass with a bit of trigonometry.

If the energy is quadratic in phi (or nearly quadratic for small phi), the motion is harmonic (anyone correct me if I'm wrong).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top