Carnot Heat Engine to Carnot Heat Pump

keith river
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
We have a carnot engine with Th = 800 degrees Celsius, and Tc = 50 degrees Celsius.
This produces a work which is drives a carnot heat pump which has heat reservoirs at Th' = 50 degrees celsius and Tc' = 0 degress Celsius.
What is the ratio of heat absorbed by the Heat Engine to the heat absorbed by the heat pump.

I know the ratio from Qh/Qc for the heat engine would be Th/Tc but when I was planning on doing the same for a heat pump (Qh'/Qc') but It doesn't work out as the ratio would be infinite (divides by 0)
I was going to rearrange for Qh/Qc' as these are the heats absorbed by the heat engine and pump respectfully but this also would be infinite.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
keith river said:
We have a carnot engine with Th = 800 degrees Celsius, and Tc = 50 degrees Celsius.
This produces a work which is drives a carnot heat pump which has heat reservoirs at Th' = 50 degrees celsius and Tc' = 0 degress Celsius.
What is the ratio of heat absorbed by the Heat Engine to the heat absorbed by the heat pump.

I know the ratio from Qh/Qc for the heat engine would be Th/Tc but when I was planning on doing the same for a heat pump (Qh'/Qc') but It doesn't work out as the ratio would be infinite (divides by 0)
I was going to rearrange for Qh/Qc' as these are the heats absorbed by the heat engine and pump respectfully but this also would be infinite.
You are using the wrong scale for temperature.

AM
 
Thanks AM
I can't believe I never noticed that before. Such a simple problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top