Change in density due to thermal expansion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving how density changes with thermal expansion, specifically transitioning from the equation Δρ=m/ΔV to Δρ/ρ= -3(ΔL/L). Participants highlight the importance of using the correct volume and length equations, noting that the volume of a cube expands as V=L^3, where L is the length that changes with temperature. There is a consensus that the negative sign in the density change equation is crucial and should be derived correctly through algebraic manipulation. One participant suggests analyzing a cube to clarify the relationships between variables, while another points out potential confusion in the algebra used. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise calculations to accurately reflect the effects of thermal expansion on density.
empty_set
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to find the mathematical proof to show that the density of an object changes with thermal expansion. My professor showed this in class and it was horribly wrong because he let a few things out. The book I'm reading showed it in 4 steps and left out a lot of the crucial parts. I've been working on this for a few days.

How do I go from, Δρ=m/ΔV, to Δρ/ρ= -3(ΔL/L) ?
I think these are the relevant equations:
V=(1+βΔT)Vi
L=(1+αΔT)Li
V=m/ρ

The Attempt at a Solution


This is how I got it but I don't think it's correct: m.imgur.com/a/ZOfCp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My friend, don't struggle so much for it.

You know that ρ=m/V.
Let ρ°=m/V°.
Then V°= V( 1+γΔT) where γ=3α.
Put that into the equation above, divide by ρ, subtract 1. You have your answer.
 
empty_set said:

Homework Statement


I want to find the mathematical proof to show that the density of an object changes with thermal expansion. My professor showed this in class and it was horribly wrong because he let a few things out. The book I'm reading showed it in 4 steps and left out a lot of the crucial parts. I've been working on this for a few days.

How do I go from, Δρ=m/ΔV, to Δρ/ρ= -3(ΔL/L) ?
I think these are the relevant equations:
V=(1+βΔT)Vi
L=(1+αΔT)Li
V=m/ρ

The Attempt at a Solution


This is how I got it but I don't think it's correct: m.imgur.com/a/ZOfCp
It isn't clear what you did. I suggest doing the analysis on a cube. $$V_0=L_0^3$$
$$V=L^3=[L_0(1+\alpha \Delta T)]^3$$
and neglect non-linear terms in ##\Delta T##.
 
For both of those methods I got Δρ/ρ = 3(ΔL/L). Would the negative be implied or is my algebra wrong?
 
empty_set said:
For both of those methods I got Δρ/ρ = 3(ΔL/L). Would the negative be implied or is my algebra wrong?
There should be a minus sign in this equation.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
Your algebra is wrong. My method WILL give a minus sign inherently. Check again. You probably got confused with the ρ and ρ°.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top