Confused About Where to Begin? Start Here!

ParticleGinger6
Messages
32
Reaction score
5
New user has been reminded to show their work on schoolwork questions
Homework Statement
Maxwell's Equation in matter reduces to Maxwell's equation in vacuum if polarization and magnetization are zero?
Relevant Equations
They can be found in the attached photo
I do not know where to start.
 

Attachments

  • Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    Chegg 5.6.20.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 265
How are polarization (i.e. the Polarization Vector Field) and magnetization (i.e. Magnetization Vector Field)\\ related to the vector fields [itex]\vec D[/itex] , [itex]\vec E[/itex], [itex]\vec B[/itex], and [itex]\vec H[/itex]?
 
@robphy so i found the equations D = epsilon*E and H = (1/mu)*H where epsilon = epsilon(not)*(1+Xe) and mu = mu(not)*(1+Xe). I think if I use that convert D into terms of P which would look like P = D - epsilon(not)*E and H = B/(mu(not)*(1+Xe)). From there you can get Magnetization from M = Xm*H

Am I on the right track
 
Yes... but use [itex]\epsilon_0[/itex] and [itex]\mu_0[/itex] instead of the [itex]\chi[/itex]s.
 
@robphy I believe I figured it out. So by using D = epsilon(not)E + P and H = B/mu(not) - M I was able to get to
dell * E = rou/epsilon(not) and dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t) for part a
Then for part b
I used P = epsilon(not)*X*E to get dell*E = rou/epsilon(not)
I used M = Xm*H to get dell cross B = mu(not)*J + mu(not)*epsilon(not)*(curly(d)*E/curly(d)t)
Both assuming mu approaches mu(not) and epsilon approaches epsilon(not)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K