Cosine Law: Query About Equation | Online Physics Course

  • Thread starter Thread starter paolostinz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the cosine law equation used to find net forces, specifically the transition from c² = a² + b² - 2ab cosC to c = [a² + b² - 2ab cosC]^(1/2). The notation x^(1/2) is clarified as an alternative to √x, which can lead to confusion. Participants express a desire for clarity on why textbooks might present equations differently, with emphasis on the preference for simpler notation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding mathematical notation to avoid errors in calculations. Overall, the exchange underscores the need for accessible educational resources to address such confusions.
paolostinz
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
My online physics course is using cosine law to find the net forces on objects. My question is to do with the equation, at first it shows it as : c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab cosC.

From there, it changes to: c=[a^2+b^2-2ab cosC]^1/2.

How and why does this work? Why isn't a square root involved in the operation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The notation ##x^{1/2}## is just another notation for ##\sqrt{x}##. Was that your question?
 
Yes, thank you! I see now, it seemed like I was getting the wrong answer when I was doing the original equation, so I thought something else was at play here.

Is there any reason why one would prefer writing the equation this way? I just don't get why my textbook would switch the equation when trying ton present new information.
 
hi paolostinz! :smile:
paolostinz said:
Is there any reason why one would prefer writing the equation this way? I just don't get why my textbook would switch the equation when trying ton present new information.

you mean, writing c instead of c2 ?

or writing (…)1/2 instead of √(…) ?

we usually want c itself, so the fact that it comes from an equation with c2 is a nuisance

(…)n is the general way of writing powers: there's no really good reason for having a special symbol when n = 1/2, and the bar of √, which should really go over the top of the bracket, is a nuisance when the bracket is long :wink:
 
See, that makes sense, it's the little things like this that confuse me most. I wish I had better access to teachers to clear up these type of hiccups. I'm so grateful for this place, thank you everyone!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top