Diffraction condition - Kittel's Intro to Solid State Physics 8th ed.

DiogenesTorch
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How to derive equation (22) on page 31 of Kittel's Intro to Solid State Physics 8th edition.

The equation is: 2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G}+G^2=0


Homework Equations



The diffraction condition is given by \Delta\vec{k}=\vec{G} which from what I can surmise is the starting point for the derivation

Here are some other relevant equations/definitions
<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \vec{k} &amp; &amp; \text{ incident wave vector} \\<br /> \vec{k&#039;} &amp; &amp; \text{ outgoing\reflected wave vector} \\<br /> \Delta \vec{k&#039;} = \vec{k&#039;}-\vec{k} &amp; &amp; \text{ scattering vector} \\<br /> \vec{G} &amp; &amp; \text{ reciprocal lattice vector} \\<br /> \end{align*}<br />



The Attempt at a Solution



Starting with the diffraction condition \Delta\vec{k}=\vec{G}

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \Delta\vec{k} &amp;= \vec{G} &amp; \\<br /> \vec{k&#039;}-\vec{k} &amp;= \vec{G} &amp; \\<br /> \vec{k}+\vec{G} &amp;= \vec{k&#039;} &amp; \\<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k&#039;}|^2 &amp; \text{If 2 vectors are equal, their squared magnitudes are equal}\\<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \text{since magnitudes k and k&#039; are equal}\\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Using the law of cosines we now have

<br /> \begin{align}<br /> |\vec{k}+\vec{G}|^2 &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \nonumber \\<br /> |\vec{k}|^2 + |\vec{G}|^2 -2|\vec{k}||\vec{G}|\cos\theta &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 &amp; \text{(1)} \\<br /> \end{align}<br />

\cos\theta is the cosine of the angle between the vectors \vec{k} and \vec{G} which is just

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \cos\theta=\frac{\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G}}{|\vec{k}||\vec{G}|}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Substituting the above into equation (1)

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> |\vec{k}|^2 + |\vec{G}|^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= |\vec{k}|^2 \\<br /> |\vec{G}|^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= 0 \\<br /> G^2 -2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} &amp;= 0 \\<br /> \end{align*}<br />

However the book is showing 2\vec{k}\cdot\vec{G} + G^2 = 0

Why is Kittel losing the minus sign in front of the dot product? I have been scratching my head for hours and can't find my error. I know this is some bone-headed oversight on my part but can't seem to find my error.


Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If \theta is the angle between \vec{k} and \vec{G} then the angle in the law of cosines should be 180^o-\theta
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top