Doppler Effect and absolute simultaneity

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
991
Reaction score
1
The Doppler shift formula relates two proper time intervals measured in I and I' respectovely
(tau)=D(tau)'
D representing a Doppler factor that depends on the relative speed of I and I'. By definition the events involved in I and I' respectively take place at the same point in space. If the two involved events are simultaneous say in I they are simultaneous in I' as well and vice-versa.
The time intervals measured by clocks synchronized using the "everyday clock" synchronization procedure are related by a Doppler shift like formula. Could that be an explanation of the absolute simultaneity: two events simultaneous say in I and taking place at the same point in space are simultaneous in all inertial reference frames.
We find the same situation in the case of Selleri's approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bernhard.rothenstein said:
The Doppler shift formula relates two proper time intervals measured in I and I' respectovely
(tau)=D(tau)'
D representing a Doppler factor that depends on the relative speed of I and I'. By definition the events involved in I and I' respectively take place at the same point in space. If the two involved events are simultaneous say in I they are simultaneous in I' as well and vice-versa. The time intervals measured by clocks synchronized using the "everyday clock" synchronization procedure are related by a Doppler shift like formula.
If you look at the absolute simultaneity equation for "left-to-right" Leubner coords

t_S(I) = \gamma \left(1 + \frac{v}{c} \right) t_S(R)​

which I obtained in this post, you will see that

\gamma \left(1 + \frac{v}{c} \right) = \sqrt{\frac{1 + \frac{v}{c}}{1 - \frac{v}{c}}} = D​

which is precisely the doppler factor between the frames I and R. This is no coincidence.

Imagine light being sent event e at the origin of the R frame at time

t_S(R)(e) = \tau(R)(e)...(1)​

(remember Einstein-time, Leubner-time and proper time are all the same at the spatial origin).

It is received event r at the origin of the I frame at time

t_S(I)(r) = \tau(I)(r)...(2)​

But because of the way S-time is defined we must have

t_S(I)(r) = t_S(I)(e) ...(3) and
t_S(R)(r) = t_S(R)(e) ...(4)​

Combining (1) with (4), and (2) with (3), and using the doppler equation

\tau(I)(r) = D \tau(R)(e)​

we get

t_S(I)(e) = D t_S(R)(e) and
t_S(I)(r) = D t_S(R)(r)​

the same absolute simultaneity equation (evaluated at both events e and r) as before.

bernhard.rothenstein said:
Could that be an explanation of the absolute simultaneity: two events simultaneous say in I and taking place at the same point in space are simultaneous in all inertial reference frames. We find the same situation in the case of Selleri's approach.
I don't really understand this. The general absolute simultaneity equation

t_S(I) = a(I) t_S(R)...(A)​

is measuring the same event in two different coord systems I and R, whereas the doppler shift equation

t_S(I)(r) = \tau(I)(r) = D \tau(R)(e) = t_S(R)(e)​

is measuring two different events e and r in (effectively) two different coords systems I and R. It's only in Leubner coords we can link the two.

(NOTE: the absolute simultaneity equation (A) could also be written

\frac{\partial t_S(I)}{\partial x_s(R)} = 0​
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top