Effective resistance of secondary circuit in transformers

AI Thread Summary
To reduce a primary voltage of 150 V to a secondary voltage of 25 V, the transformer requires 22 windings in the secondary circuit. The effective resistance of the secondary circuit is calculated using the formula Reff = R(N1/N2)^2, where R is the load resistance. Despite using this equation, there is confusion regarding the calculation, as the expected effective resistance is not matching the derived value of 1500. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the transformer equations and understanding that secondary circuit resistance depends solely on the load. Clarification on the calculations and formulas used is needed to resolve the discrepancy in the effective resistance.
sarah68
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You need a transformer to reduce a voltage of 150 V in the primary circuit to 25 V in the secondary circuit. The primary circuit has 130 windings and the secondary circuit is completed through a 55 ? resistor. (a) How many windings should the secondary circuit contain? (b) What is the effective resistance of the secondary circuit?

Homework Equations



V2/V1=N2/N1

Reff= R(N1/N2)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved part A. N2 is 22 windings. However, part B is 1500 but I can't seem to get that answer! I used the above equation but it doesn't give me that answer. Is the Reff equation that I'm using wrong? Please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you got the secondary circuit voltage and windings also. you its correct secondary circuit resistance is depend on load only.
 
Yes, but if I plug in the values with that equation I don't get 1500 for part B. I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top