Electric fields equalling zero

AI Thread Summary
To find the point where the total electric field from two charges Q1 and Q2 is zero, one must consider their signs and distances. If the charges are like, the zero field point lies between them, while if they are opposite, it will be outside, closer to the weaker charge. The distances from this point to each charge can be expressed in terms of each other, noting that they will not be equal unless the charges are identical. The electric field contributions should be calculated using Coulomb's law, ensuring to consider both the magnitudes and directions of the fields. Properly setting up the equations is crucial for accurately determining the position where the net electric field equals zero.
mrpbll
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Trying to work this one out.
If you have two charges Q1 and Q2 separated by a distance of x then how do you show what distance from the charge Q1 is the total electric from the two charges zero.

I know that Enet =E1 +E2 and if i use coulombs law i get:
KQ1/x^2 +KQ2/x^2
the K cancles and you get Q1/x^2 + Q2/x^2 = 0 but that doest seeem right. anyone with any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are the charges like or opposite in sign? If theyre like in sign, the point will be inbetween them, but if theyre opposite in sign, the point will be outside and closer to the weaker charge.

Lets say the charges are like. That means that the distance from the spot to one charge + the distance from the spot to the other charge = x. The trick is to write one distance in terms of the other. The point will not be rigt inbetween the 2 unless the charges are equal, and then its not much of a question.

Now let's say the charges are opposite, one charge will be a distance r from the point and the second charge will be a distance r + x
 
both charges are positive
 
I know that Enet =E1 +E2 and if i use coulombs law i get:
KQ1/x^2 +KQ2/x^2
You didn't add forces here: you merely added their magnitudes.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top