Electric potential:Potential difference of test charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential difference between two points in an electric field created by a negative charge. Initial calculations for electric potential energy and potential at two distances from the charge are presented, revealing confusion about the relevance of the test charge's value. The correct approach emphasizes that only the anchored charge's field affects the potential difference, making the test charge's value unnecessary. The final potential difference is clarified as -450,000 V after correcting the initial calculations. Understanding that the potential is solely due to the anchored charge is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
yuminie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A positive test charge of 1.5uC is placed in an electric field, 10 cm from another charge of -5.0uC that is anchored in place. What is the potential difference between the initial position of the test charge, and a point 5 cm closer to the negative charge?
Relevant Equations
Ee=kq1q2/r
Δv=ΔEe/q
v=kq/r
Electric potential energy at initial:
Ee=kq1q2/r
=(9 ×10 ^9×1.5×10^-6×(-5)×10^-6)/0.1
=-0.675J
Electric potential energy at the closer point:
Ee=kq1q2/r
=(9 ×10^9×1.5×10^-6×(-5)×10^-6)/0.05
=-1.35J
Δv=ΔEe/q
=(-1.35+0.675)/1.5×10^-6
=4.5×10^5V

or:

Initial position:
v=kq/r
=9 ×10^9×1.5×10^-6/0.1
=13500v
closer position:
v=kq/r
=9 ×10^9×(-5)×10^-6/0.05
=-900000v
Δv=-900000-13500=-913500V

I am very confused on this question. Please send help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yuminie said:
What is the potential difference between the initial position of the test charge, and a point 5 cm closer to the negative charge?
Note that they are asking about the potential due to the field of the anchored charge, not potential energy.
 
  • Like
Likes yuminie
Doc Al said:
Note that they are asking about the potential due to the field of the anchored charge, not potential energy.
Hi, thank you for your reply, this is how I changed my answer:
Initial position:
v=kq/r
=9 ×10^9×(-5)×10^-6/0.1
=-450000v
closer position:
v=kq/r
=9 ×10^9×(-5)×10^-6/0.05
=-900000v
Δv=-900000+450000=-450000V
Since its due to the field of the anchored charge, the charge of the test charge would not be needed?
Thanks.
 
yuminie said:
Since its due to the field of the anchored charge, the charge of the test charge would not be needed?
Yes, that's how I interpret the problem.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, that's how I interpret the problem.
Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top