Excel graphing problems with a Physics lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on graphing issues encountered while plotting data from a physics lab on spherical lenses. The user initially graphed their data as a linear function, contrary to the expected decreasing curve shown by the instructor. Suggestions include using a scatter plot instead of a line chart to accurately represent the data points. The user has attempted the scatter plot method but still obtained a linear graph, leading to doubts about the instructor's sketch. They plan to verify their results using traditional graphing methods before seeking further assistance with the data.
BrewDaddy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have two columns of data to graph from a lab we did on spherical lenses. The instructor showed a quick and dirty sketch of what our graph should look like - a decreasing curve. My data plots as an increasing linear graph. If I flip the x-axis data top to bottom I can get it to look like the instructor said it should, but I'm kinda stumped. Any suggestions? I can supply the data if needed.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello BrewDaddy,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

If one column is for the x-axis and the other column is for the y-axis, do not choose a "Line" chart in Excel. Doing so will plot the column linearly, with equally spaced points on the x-axis, which is not what you would want in this case (it would essentially ignore your unique x-axis data).

Instead (if you have your own x-axis data), use the "Scatter" plot option. That let's you plot (x, y) data points. You can still connect the data points with lines if you want.
 
Thanks for the welcome! I have already tried the scatterplot method, but it still gives me the linear graph. I'm starting to think that the instructor was mistaken in his sketch of what the graph should look like - maybe he got mixed up with the graph from a different lab - we've done quite a few of them. I'm going to give it a shot the old fashioned pencil and graph paper way and see what I get. If I still get the same result I'll post the data and see if anyone can come up with any ideas. It's only 20 data points or so.

BD
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top