Find index of refraction of the prism for 2 wavelengths

AI Thread Summary
To find the index of refraction for a prism at two different wavelengths using Snell's Law, one must use the angles of refraction provided. The problem does not specify the wavelengths, but it is implied that they differ, allowing for distinct refractive indices. By calculating the angles from the normal for each exit ray and applying Snell's Law, the refractive indices can be determined. The discussion emphasizes that the geometry of the situation allows for solving the problem without needing additional information beyond the angles. Ultimately, the refractive indices for both wavelengths can be derived from the established relationships.
Ed Boon
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


phys222.jpg


Homework Equations


Snell's Law: na*sin(theta of a) = nb*sin(theta of b)
wavelength = index of refraction / n
n = c / v

The Attempt at a Solution


The only information given in the problem is the 2 angles of refraction and of course n of air is 1, I do not understand how to get the index of refraction for both wavelengths with just the angles given and nothing more. They do not state the wavelengths of the rays. I assume it is solvable because it is in the text but if someone could maybe lead me in any direction I would appreciate it.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not asking for their wavelengths, you just have to assume the wavelengths are different so that the refractive index can be different.
It's simply a geometry question, find the angle from the normal for each of the exit rays and then just use Snell's law to calculate 'n' for each of them.
 
mgb_phys said:
It's not asking for their wavelengths, you just have to assume the wavelengths are different so that the refractive index can be different.
It's simply a geometry question, find the angle from the normal for each of the exit rays and then just use Snell's law to calculate 'n' for each of them.

Thats what I was thinking so you will have na*sin(theta of a) equals to both nb*sin(0b) and nc*sin(0c) (b and c the 2 refractions) so if u set the 2 equal to each other:
nb*sin(20.5) = nc*sin(12)
dont you need more info to get the exact values instead of just a ratio?
thanks for the quick response
 
Assuming the prism is in air, anf consideringthe refraction at the exit face - isn't it just
na sin(internal angle ) = 1 * sin(12+external angle)
nb sin(internal angle ) = 1 * sin(12+8.5+external angle)

And the angle from normal inside the prism is just the angle from normal to the horizontal dashed line outside ( and is equal to the prism wedge angle)
na sin(x) = sin (12 + x)
nb sin(x) = sin(20.5 + x)
It should be possible to rearrange this to get exact values of na and nb without knowingx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top