Finding Electric Field of Exponential Charge Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the electric field for an exponential charge distribution defined by the density function ρ(x) = e^(-κ√(x²)). Participants express uncertainty about the nature of the charge distribution, questioning whether it exists solely along the x-axis or throughout three-dimensional space. They debate the appropriate surface for applying Gauss's Law, considering options like spheres and cylinders, and whether to treat the problem similarly to that of an infinite wire. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the integration limits and the total enclosed charge, suggesting a formal approach to writing q_enc as an integral of the charge density. Ultimately, the group is exploring the best method to apply Gauss's Law to find the electric field in this specific charge distribution scenario.
rodriguez1gv
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am to find the electric field for a charge distribution of
$$ \rho(x)= e^{-\kappa \sqrt{x^2}} $$


Homework Equations



I know that gauss law is $$ \int E \cdot da = \frac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0} $$

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure what the charge distribution looks like. Is this saying that there is only charge along the x axis? or is the charge everywhere? I am also no sure what kind of surface I should be integrating over. Should I be integrating over a circle and then finding the total charge enclosed within?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is x a vector? If not, assume one dimension. Your surface area will most likely be of a sphere. Also, recall that q_{enc} is the total charge. Can you think of another (more formal) way to write q_{enc}?
 
x appears to be a scalar. Does this mean that the charge only exists along the x axis? Or is it also distributed through the y-z plane? And the q_{enc} can be written as \int \rho(x) I believe. So I should be able to just integrate my charge distribution from -x to x and consider the area a sphere of radius x? That doesn't seem quite right to me for some reason since I have an x symmetry should I be using a cylinder? similar to a line of charge along the x axis?
 
Last edited:
Yes, really what we have is a point charge in one dimension, where we only consider the charge density along the x-axis. I suppose a cylinder would be fitting for Gauss's Law. Yes, you are correct about integrating along the x-axis.
 
Using a cylinder seems to give me a dependence on both x and y. I feel like there should be a simpler choice of surface, but I cannot seem to think of it. I have also tried a sphere centered at the origin. I am not sure how I would apply a plane.
 
Perhaps, we can treat this similar to the case for an infinite wire? Are we finding the E-field at some point say on the y-axis, or some point on the x-axis?

Must we use Gauss's Law?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top