Finding Electric Field of Exponential Charge Distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the electric field for an exponential charge distribution defined by the density function ρ(x) = e^(-κ√(x²)). Participants express uncertainty about the nature of the charge distribution, questioning whether it exists solely along the x-axis or throughout three-dimensional space. They debate the appropriate surface for applying Gauss's Law, considering options like spheres and cylinders, and whether to treat the problem similarly to that of an infinite wire. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the integration limits and the total enclosed charge, suggesting a formal approach to writing q_enc as an integral of the charge density. Ultimately, the group is exploring the best method to apply Gauss's Law to find the electric field in this specific charge distribution scenario.
rodriguez1gv
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am to find the electric field for a charge distribution of
$$ \rho(x)= e^{-\kappa \sqrt{x^2}} $$


Homework Equations



I know that gauss law is $$ \int E \cdot da = \frac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0} $$

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure what the charge distribution looks like. Is this saying that there is only charge along the x axis? or is the charge everywhere? I am also no sure what kind of surface I should be integrating over. Should I be integrating over a circle and then finding the total charge enclosed within?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is x a vector? If not, assume one dimension. Your surface area will most likely be of a sphere. Also, recall that q_{enc} is the total charge. Can you think of another (more formal) way to write q_{enc}?
 
x appears to be a scalar. Does this mean that the charge only exists along the x axis? Or is it also distributed through the y-z plane? And the q_{enc} can be written as \int \rho(x) I believe. So I should be able to just integrate my charge distribution from -x to x and consider the area a sphere of radius x? That doesn't seem quite right to me for some reason since I have an x symmetry should I be using a cylinder? similar to a line of charge along the x axis?
 
Last edited:
Yes, really what we have is a point charge in one dimension, where we only consider the charge density along the x-axis. I suppose a cylinder would be fitting for Gauss's Law. Yes, you are correct about integrating along the x-axis.
 
Using a cylinder seems to give me a dependence on both x and y. I feel like there should be a simpler choice of surface, but I cannot seem to think of it. I have also tried a sphere centered at the origin. I am not sure how I would apply a plane.
 
Perhaps, we can treat this similar to the case for an infinite wire? Are we finding the E-field at some point say on the y-axis, or some point on the x-axis?

Must we use Gauss's Law?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top