Finding Thevenin equivalent circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Thevenin equivalent resistance of a circuit containing dependent sources. Participants explore various methods to calculate the Thevenin resistance, including node-voltage and mesh current analysis, while addressing challenges and uncertainties in their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using node-voltage analysis to find the Thevenin resistance but express difficulty in their calculations.
  • Others suggest that an external source is necessary when dealing with dependent sources, leading to confusion about how to apply it correctly.
  • A participant mentions that the output resistance may vary with external conditions, complicating the determination of a single value for Thevenin resistance.
  • There is a discussion about using the open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current method, with some participants clarifying that the short-circuit current should be used to find the Thevenin resistance.
  • One participant corrects another regarding the treatment of independent sources when using different methods to find Thevenin resistance.
  • Several participants report arriving at a value of approximately 12 ohms for the Thevenin resistance, but there is uncertainty about whether this value is consistent across different methods.
  • Some participants express frustration over their algebra and understanding of the concepts, indicating a learning process in progress.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the Thevenin resistance can be found using various methods, but there is no consensus on the best approach or whether a single value can be reliably determined due to the presence of dependent sources and varying conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the presence of dependent sources may lead to non-constant output resistance, and there are discussions about the implications of using different methods for calculating Thevenin resistance.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and practitioners interested in circuit analysis, particularly those dealing with Thevenin equivalents and dependent sources, may find this discussion beneficial.

november1992
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the Thevenin resistance.

http://i.imgur.com/XoEfy.png

Homework Equations



Rth =Vex/Iex

The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the thevenin voltage is 869.304mV. I read in my textbook that in order to find the thevenin resistance in a circuit that contains a dependent source an external source is required, then the circuit can be solved using any method possible. So I added an external source to my circuit and then I tried using node-voltage to solve it, but I am stuck.

kcl Node 1: \frac{V1}{70} + \frac{V1-V3}{13} + 5V2 = 0
kcl node 2: -5V2 + \frac{V2}{50} + \frac{V2 -V3}{18} = 0
kcl node 3: \frac{V3-V2}{18} + \frac{V3-V1}{13} + \frac{V3}{16} - Iex = 0I ended up with Rth = -1.24118

I know this isn't right. Even if it was right, I don't know how I can find Vex using that information.

Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?Edit: I think I should use mesh current. I'll try that now.

Using mesh current I ended up with 1.99 as Rth. None of my answers are right. I built the circuit and the resistance is supposed to be 12 ohms.

I think it may just be my algebra that's messing my answers up. I had 4 equations for the mesh current analysis.

70I1 + 5Vx + 50(I1-I2) = 0
16(I2-I3) + 50(I2-I1) + 18(I2-14) = 0
Vex + 16(I3-I2)=0
18(I4-I2)-5Vx + 13I4=0
Vx = 50(I1-I2)I think I overcomplicated this by using an external source. It would have been fine if I just tried to find the short circuit current parallel to the 16 ohm resistor.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
november1992 said:

Homework Statement



Find the Thevenin resistance.

http://i.imgur.com/XoEfy.png

Homework Equations



Rth =Vex/Iex


The Attempt at a Solution


I found that the thevenin voltage is 869.304mV. I read in my textbook that in order to find the thevenin resistance in a circuit that contains a dependent source an external source is required, then the circuit can be solved using any method possible. So I added an external source to my circuit and then I tried using node-voltage to solve it, but I am stuck.

kcl Node 1: \frac{V1}{70} + \frac{V1-V3}{13} + 5V2 = 0
kcl node 2: -5V2 + \frac{V2}{50} + \frac{V2 -V3}{18} = 0
kcl node 3: \frac{V3-V2}{18} + \frac{V3-V1}{13} + \frac{V3}{16} - Iex = 0


I ended up with Rth = -1.24118

I know this isn't right. Even if it was right, I don't know how I can find Vex using that information.

Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
In your node 1 equation you've left out the 6V battery in the 1st term.

If you're using a current source (Iex) to probe the circuit, then Vex will be identical to the node 3 voltage V3.
Edit: I think I should use mesh current. I'll try that now.

Using mesh current I ended up with 1.99 as Rth. None of my answers are right. I built the circuit and the resistance is supposed to be 12 ohms.

I think it may just be my algebra that's messing my answers up. I had 4 equations for the mesh current analysis.

70I1 + 5Vx + 50(I1-I2) = 0
16(I2-I3) + 50(I2-I1) + 18(I2-14) = 0
Vex + 16(I3-I2)=0
18(I4-I2)-5Vx + 13I4=0
Vx = 50(I1-I2)


I think I overcomplicated this by using an external source. I think it would have been fine if I just shorted the voltage source, and then tried to find the short circuit currentparallel to the 16 ohm resistor.

This happens to be a type of circuit where the output resistance actually varies with the external conditions. That is, due to the sneaky operation of the active source, the apparent output resistance of the circuit will vary as you vary the external current or voltage supply you're using to determine the resistance. Because of this I don't know if there's a single value you can use as an answer! Perhaps the minimum resistance, which is about 12.03 Ohms, which is about the value you mentioned.

Note that since the circuit contains an independent fixed source it can "stimulate" itself without an external probing source. To find the "base" values for the Thevenin voltage and resistance you can just slap resistive load RL onto the output and then solve for the output voltage in terms of that load resistance. The idea is to wrestle the resulting expression into the form of a voltage divider where your RL plays the role of the "lower" resistor. It will yield an expression of the form:
$$V3 = Vth \frac{RL}{RL + Rth} $$
with Vth, Rth and RL playing the role of the voltage divider. You can pick both Vth and Rth out of the expression all in one go.
 
That equation you wrote looks similar to the one in my textbook, but it deals with maximum power transfer. The way my professor wanted me to solve for the thevenin resistance was to find the thevenin voltage and divide by the open-circuit current.

http://i.imgur.com/OkJNF.png
 
november1992 said:
That equation you wrote looks similar to the one in my textbook, but it deals with maximum power transfer. The way my professor wanted me to solve for the thevenin resistance was to find the thevenin voltage and divide by the open-circuit current.

http://i.imgur.com/OkJNF.png

Surely that would be the short-circuit current. You'd find the open-circuit voltage (Thevenin voltage) and short-circuit current (Norton current) and then divide.

The resulting Thevenin model won't account for the variation in output resistance that I mentioned above. But it could be that this issue is not relevant at this point in your coursework.

To find the short-circuit current, try placing a load resistor RL on the output and then solving for the node 3 voltage (it will be an expression containing RL) The current will be V3/RL. Take the limit as RL goes to zero.
 
Yes, I meant short-circuit current. I mixed up the different steps in my textbook. For another method it says when deactivating a current source, it should be replaced with an open circuit.

I'll give that a try.
 
november1992 said:
Yes, I meant short-circuit current. I mixed up the different steps in my textbook. For another method it says when deactivating a current source, it should be replaced with an open circuit.

Yes this is correct. Let me summarize.

- If you use the Voc Isc method (open circuit voltage and short circuit current) then you must leave the independent sources intact.

- If you use the "test source" method (external source) then you should set all the other independent sources to zero (a zero voltage source is a s/c and a zero current source is an o/c). The preferred method is usually to use a 1A test source and perform nodal analysis. Your circuit gives a fairly easy 3 node system.

As long as the sources are linear (that is, they depend only on constant multiples of other voltages and currents) then the presence of dependent sources will NOT cause the Thevenin resistance to be non constant (operating point dependent).

The Thevenin resistance in this circuit is a constant and equal to about 12.025 ohms (using nodal analysis the test source method).
 
I got 12.025. I used mesh current analysis. I misread the section in my textbook about supermeshes. I thought that supermeshes were only used when an independent current source was shared by two meshes. I didn't know that dependent current sources were acceptable. Boy do I feel stupid; I spent about 5 hours on this problem :p
 
november1992 said:
I got 12.025. I used mesh current analysis. I misread the section in my textbook about supermeshes.
Ok, good that you got it. :)

Nodal analysis is easier though, only three nodal equations and no supermesh.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K