Force Resolving Structural Engineering Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Method of Joints to resolve forces in a structural engineering problem. The user seeks clarification on determining the signs of forces and their implications, particularly regarding compressive and tensile forces. They provide calculations for joints A and B, noting that negative values indicate compressive forces while positive values indicate tensile forces. The user expresses confusion about the force at joint B, questioning how it can be zero despite a load on the bridge. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding force equilibrium and the significance of force direction in structural analysis.
The Gradient Guru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the help but I'm still a little stuck. I can work out the magnitudes fine but I'm a bit confused as to where the negatives should be and what they actually represent. This is my working so far (the joints are labelled A-K from left to right):

Fab = Force along member AB

Consider Joint A:

Sum of Verticals at A=25+Fab*sin60=0
Fab*sin60=-25
Fab=-28.8N

Since this is negative it is a compressive force.

Sum of Horizontals at A=Fab*cos60+Fac=0
-28.88*cos60=-Fac
Fac=14.4N

Since this is positive it is a tensile force.

Consider Joint B (This is where I get confused:

Sum of Verticals at B=Fab*sin60+Fbc*sin60+Fbd*sin0=0
28.88*sin60+Fbc*sin60+0=0
Fbc*sin60=-28.88*sin60
Fbc=-28.88

Since this is negative it is a compressive force.

Sum of Horizontals at B= Fab*cos60-Fbc*cos60+Fbd*cos0=0
28.88*cos60-Fbc*cos60+Fbd=0
-Fbc*cos60+Fbd=-28.88*cos60
Fbd=0N

Have I got all of the negatives right because I really have no idea how they are determined and also, is it even possible for Fbd to have a force of 0N on this bridge given that there is a force of 50N on the center of the bridge?

Thanks for any help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top