Heat Transfer - Heat Flux (thermal Resistance)

Icetray
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



qoC85IB.jpg




Hi guys,

I don't really need help with answering the dollowing question but just have a quick question about it.

I solved the first part of the question with an energy balance by letting q_{conduction} = q_{convection} to get the temperature of he outer surface temperature of the wire.

For the heat flux part, why can't the heat flux = q_{conduction} = q_{convection}? Shouldn't the heat flux be constant throughout?

Thanks in advance guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Icetray said:

Homework Statement



qoC85IB.jpg




Hi guys,

I don't really need help with answering the dollowing question but just have a quick question about it.

I solved the first part of the question with an energy balance by letting q_{conduction} = q_{convection} to get the temperature of he outer surface temperature of the wire.

For the heat flux part, why can't the heat flux = q_{conduction} = q_{convection}? Shouldn't the heat flux be constant throughout?

Thanks in advance guys!
Because the heat flux is varying with radial position within the wire, and, even if it weren't, the circumferential perimeter available for heat flow is varying with radius. At any radial location, the product of the heat flux and 2πr represents the local radial heat flow per unit length of wire.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top