Homogeneization of physic formula of electromagnetic field and velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a confusion regarding the units in electromagnetic field equations, particularly the relationship between electric potential (\vec A) and velocity (\vec v). The original poster notes that their calculations yield units of volts per velocity, which raises questions about the validity of this unit. They also explore the units of the magnetic field, finding discrepancies when using different approaches, such as \vec v X \nabla X \vec A versus using Tesla multiplied by velocity. Clarifications indicate that the poster mistakenly equated the units of \vec A with velocity, as \vec A actually has units of Tesla·m, not m/s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly understanding the dimensional analysis in electromagnetic equations.
Plott029
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= I have a little problem with a formula, that I think it's not ok. It gives to me the result of units of electric potential (\vec A) and velocity \vec v. The result seems to be volts per velocity, and I don't know it there exists this unit, or is a mistake.

In other hand, when i try to develope the units of the magnetic field, if i use \vec v X \nabla X \vec A it gives to me units of diference of potential per unit of time:

\frac {[L]}{[T} \frac {1}{[L]} \frac {[L]}{[T]} = <u>/[T]</u>

and using tesla x velocity, it gives different result:
\frac {[L][M]}{[T]^3 <i>} </i>

I don't know what I'm not doing correctly. Could you give me a little help?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe the problem is that I must utilize power ecuations... like UI and FV. The problem now is that I have an equation that has UIFV, with dimensions of power^2...
 
Plott029 said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= I have a little problem with a formula, that I think it's not ok. It gives to me the result of units of electric potential (\vec A) and velocity \vec v. The result seems to be volts per velocity, and I don't know it there exists this unit, or is a mistake.

In other hand, when i try to develope the units of the magnetic field, if i use \vec v X \nabla X \vec A it gives to me units of diference of potential per unit of time:

\frac {[L]}{[T} \frac {1}{[L]} \frac {[L]}{[T]} = <u>/[T]</u>

I don't understand what you did here. Okay, I see that
v → L/T
del operator → 1/L
but why do you say
A → L/T ?​
A has units of Tesla·m, not m/s as you are implying.

and using tesla x velocity, it gives different result:
\frac {[L][M]}{[T]^3 <i>} </i>

This is correct.

I don't know what I'm not doing correctly. Could you give me a little help?

Thanks.
See above; it looks like you incorrectly equated A with a velocity.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top