How Is Work Calculated in a Thermodynamic Process with Constant T2/V Ratio?

DottZakapa
Messages
239
Reaction score
17
A volume VA contains n mole of a bi-atomic ideal gas, initially at temperature TA. Burning an amount M of methane, whose calorific power P (produced heat per unit mass while burning) is 13271 [kcal/kg], the temperature is slowly doubled, simultaneously expanding the volume in order to maintain the ratio (T2 / V) constant. Assuming that no heat is wasted in the environment.
DATA:
n= 0.3 [mole]; R= 0.082 [litre*atm/(mole*K)] ;
VA=9 [litre] ; TA=300 [K]; 1 [cal]=4.18[J]]

Following there is what I've solved so far:
PA=(nRTA)/ VA

TB= 2TA

VB=(TB2⋅VA)/ TA2= 4VA

PB=(nR2TA)/ 4VA

Considering that pressure and temperature aren't constant during the transformation, I'm not sure which value instead of pressure I have to insert in the integral in order to evaluate the work during the transformation.

W=∫ p⋅dV

I guess that I shall use this relation :

T2 / V = TA2 / VA

The solution to this is :

W=∫ p⋅dV=2nRTA

but I don't get how.
Could somebody help me with this?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How are T, V, TA, and VA related?

In terms of TA, VA, and n, what is the initial pressure pA?

What is the pressure when the volume is V?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
How are T, V, TA, and VA related?

In terms of TA, VA, and n, what is the initial pressure pA?

What is the pressure when the volume is V?

Chet
I've edited the template
 
Express p as a function of n, TA, VA and V. Then integrate.

Chet
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top