How to Determine Electric Field Strength in a Thunderstorm?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric field strength at 6.8 km in a thunderstorm model with localized charges, the calculation involves using the equation E = kq/r^2 for each charge. The contributions from the positive charge at 10 km, the negative charge at 5 km, and the positive charge at 2 km must be calculated separately, considering their distances from the point of interest and their respective directions. The principle of superposition allows for the summation of these electric field vectors to find the total electric field strength. The direction of the electric field from the 10 km charge is downward, while the contributions from the other charges must also be assessed for their respective directions. Understanding the signs and directions of the electric fields is crucial for arriving at a coherent solution.
Ryo124
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
A theoretical model of a thunderstorm cloud has a localized positive charge P = 40.0 C at 10 km altitude, a localized negative charge N = -40.0 C at 5 km altitude, and a localized positive charge p = 5.0 C at 2 km altitude.

The three charges are assumed to have equal horizontal coordinates. Determine the electric field strength at the same horizontal coordinates and height 6.8 km.


I know that I am supposed to calculate the individual forces but I really need someone to "walk" me through this problem step-by-step please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't walk you through because that will give you the answer, but I will give you the steps. You should use the eqn E = kq/r^2

1) You want the E field at 6.8km, so put your origin there
2) What the Efield contribution from the 10km charge? How will you find the distance between from the origin at 6.8km (or 0 in your new system) and the one at 10km (or what in your new system)? Don't think too hard, it's merely those translation guys that you cover in high school. What direction is it in?
3) From the 5km charge? Direction?
4) How about the 2km one?
5) What does superposition say you can do?
6) Did you get the answer? Does it make sense?
 
Having trouble with the directions of the E-fields. Is the hypothetical "point charge" a positive or negative value?

So, you calculate the separate Efields acting on 6.8km and add directions? I just am having trouble with the directions.
 
The point charge is positive. So the 10km should give you a direction down, or -j if you use vector notation. What do you have for that one?
 
Got it. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top