How to use the completeness relation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sergio Rodriguez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that if the operator relation (Ωf)* = -Ωf* holds for any real function f, then the expectation value ⟨Ω⟩ must equal zero. Participants explore the completeness relation and its application in quantum mechanics, emphasizing the integral representation of states and the use of orthonormal eigenfunctions. The calculations show that the expectation value can be expressed as a sum over eigenvalues weighted by coefficients from the expansion of f. A participant seeks clarification on the notation and references specific sections in a textbook to better understand the derivation. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying quantum mechanical principles to derive meaningful results.
Sergio Rodriguez
Messages
14
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Show that if ##\left( \Omega f\right) ^* = -\Omega f ^* ##
then ##\left< \Omega \right> = 0 ## for any real function f. where ##\Omega## is an operator

Homework Equations


It's a self test of the completeness relation --Molecular quantum mechanics (Atkins)--
so the equation is
$$ \sum_s \left| s \right> \left< s \right| = 1 $$


The Attempt at a Solution



## \left< \Omega \right> = \left<m\left|\Omega\right|n\right>## for any functions ##f_m## and ##f_n##
if ## f_m = f_n = f ##, then ## \left<\Omega\right> = \left<f\left|\Omega\right|f\right>
##
and as f is a real function ## f^* = f##, so:
##\left( \Omega f\right) ^* = -\Omega f ^* = -\Omega f ##
##\left( \Omega f\right) ^* = \Omega^* f^* = \Omega^* f ##
so ##\Omega^* f = -\Omega f ##
##\Omega^* \left|f\right> = -\Omega \left|f\right>##
##\left<f \left| \Omega^* \right|f\right> = - \left< f\left|\Omega \right|f\right>##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sergio Rodriguez said:
## \left< \Omega \right> = \left<m\left|\Omega\right|n\right>## for any functions ##f_m## and ##f_n##
if ## f_m = f_n = f ##, then ## \left<\Omega\right> = \left<f\left|\Omega\right|f\right>##
That's not correct. The expectation value of an operator ##\langle \Omega \rangle## over a state ##\psi## is always ##\langle \Omega \rangle = \langle \psi | \Omega | \psi \rangle##. There is thus no need to assume ## f_m = f_n = f ##.
Sergio Rodriguez said:
Don't know hot to get in the Bra ket notation and relate it with ##\left<\Omega\right>##
Since you are dealing with a function ##f##, I would approach it using the completeness relation expressed as an integral over a basis set of functions ##\{\phi_n\}##. In any case, the idea is to introduce identity operators that you can then convert using the completeness relation, e.g.,
$$
\langle \psi | \Omega | \psi \rangle = \langle \psi | (1 \times \Omega \times 1) | \psi \rangle = \sum_m\sum_n \langle \psi | m \rangle \langle m | \Omega | n \rangle \langle n | \psi \rangle
$$
 
I have do this:

As I don't know if f is an eigenfunction of Ω, I expand it as ## f = \sum_n c_nf_n## where ##f_n## are orthonormal eigenfunctions of Ω, so:

##\left<Ω\right> = \left<f\left|Ω\right|f\right> = \left<f\left|1*Ω*1\right|f\right> ##
##\sum_m\sum_n \left<f|m\right>\left<m\left|Ω\right|n\right>\left<n|f\right> = \sum_m\sum_n c_n^2 \left<m|m\right>\left<m\left|Ω\right|n\right>\left<n|n\right>##

As ## f_n ## are orthonormal the double sum become a single sum:
##\sum_n c_n^2 \left<n\left|Ω\right|n\right> = \sum_n c_n^2ω_n## where ##ω_n## are the eigenvalues, so ##\left<Ω\right> = \sum_n c_n^2ω_n ##

The second part is:

##(Ωf)^* = -Ωf^* = -Ωf ## as f is a real function
##f(Ωf)^*= -fΩf ##
##\int f(Ωf)^*\,dτ = \int -fΩf\, dτ##
##\sum_n \int c_nf_n(Ωc_nf_n)^*\,dτ = - \sum_n \int c_nf_nΩc_nf_n\, dτ##
##\sum_n c_n^2ω_n^* \int f_nf_n\,dτ = - \sum_n c_n^2ω_n \int f_nf_n\, dτ## And as ##\int f_nf_n\, dτ = 1##
##\sum_n c_n^2ω_n^* = - \sum_n c_n^2ω_n##
And as ##\sum_n c_n^2ω_n = \left<Ω\right>##
##\sum_n c_n^2ω_n^* = - \left<Ω\right>##

But I don't know how to follow it.
 
Last edited:
Could you tell me where in the book this is? I want to explain using the same notation and referring to particular equations.
 
Thank you!

It's the first chapter. Section 1.20 Matrix Elements. Example 1.9, Self-test 1.9, page 33.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top