Mesh Analysis AC, solving simultaneous equations....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving mesh analysis equations for an AC circuit using Kirchhoff's laws. The user initially presents their mesh equations but doubts their correctness after comparing them with a previous thread. Corrections are suggested regarding the sign of the imaginary component in one of the voltage terms, leading to revised equations. After multiple adjustments and calculations, the user successfully determines the mesh currents, including a complex current value for I. The conversation concludes with the user transitioning to node analysis after resolving the mesh equations.
kibara
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys I'm doing the mesh analysis of AC circuit and looking for some guidance.
Here is the mesh picture and some components data:
bBF28L


mesh-Analysis.png


Homework Equations


Kirchoff's voltage law and current law.

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided that mesh currents are going in clockwise direction.

mesh1: V1-I1(Z1+Z4)+I2Z4=0

120-I1(2-J5)+I2(-J5)=0 eq(1)

mesh2: -V3-I2(Z4+Z5)+I1Z4+I3Z5=0

-14.14+J14.14-I2(J4-J5)+I1(-J5)+I3(J4)=0 eq(2)

mesh3: -V2-I3(Z3+Z5)+I2Z5=0

-J120-I3(4+J4)+I2(J4)=0 eq(3)

Are these equations correct ?
 

Attachments

  • mesh-Analysis.png
    mesh-Analysis.png
    14 KB · Views: 1,140
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for your response gneill.

I've seen the above link previously that;s why I doubted my above equations as they are different so is my whole calculation which is as follows:

Multiplying eq(2) by 4+j4 and eq(3) by j4

-113.12-I2(4-j4)+I1(20-j20)+I3(-16+j16)=0 new eq(2)

480-I3(-16+j16)+I2(-16) new eq(3)

Adding (3) to (2)

366.88+I1(20+j20)-I2(20-j4)=0 eq(4)

Multiplying eq(1) by (20-j4) and (4) by (-j5)

120(20-j4)-I1(2-j5)(20-j4)+I2(-j5)(20-j4)=0

2400-j480-I1(20-j108)+I2(-20-j100)=0 new eq(1)

366.88(-j5)+I1(20+j20)(-j5)-I2(20-j4)(-j5)=0

-j1834.4+I1(100-j100)-I2(-20-j100)=0 new eq(4)

Subtracting new eq(4) from new eq(1)

j1834.4-j480+2400-I1(20-j108)-I1(100-j100)=0

2400+j1354.4-I1(120-j208)=0

I1 = 0.1090 + j11.4756 (to 4 d.p.)

Substituted value of I1 into initial eq(1) and obtained

120-(0.1090+j11.4756)(2-j5)+I2(-j5)=0

-57.596-j22.4062+I2(-j5)= -120

I2(-j5) = -120+57.596+j22.4062

I2= -4.4812-j12.4808

Substituted value of I2 into initial eq(3) and solved for I3:

-j120+(-4.4812-j12.4808)(j4)-I3(4+j4)=0

49.9232-j17.9248-I3(4+j4) = j120

I3=-11.0002-j23.481 Can someone tell me what did I do wrong. Also I'm not sure what to think about negative value of current when expressed in complex notation. I mean if the circuit would be pure resistance I would swap negative value for positive, right ? let's say if I= -12 A i would swap for I=12 A.

Another thing. In what format can I input complex notation in Octave ? Can it be:

octave:1> A = [4+j4, -j5+j2]

Regards.
 
Taking another look at your mesh equations, I noticed that you've made ##V_3 = 14.14 - j14.14## for your mesh2 equation. Why the negative imaginary component? Should be ##10\sqrt{2}(1 + j)##.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
As far as negative values in complex numbers, it could be thought of as a phase shift (or opposite direction). A phase shift of 180° is in the opposite direction.
As @gneill pointed out, it looks like you have a mistake, which needs fixing. But the value of -11 - j23.48 converted to polar form is 25.93 at an angle of -115.1°, if that helps you to visualize it.
 
  • Like
Likes kibara
Hello again.

gneill V3 = 20 <45 = 14.14 + j14.14 V3 is going anticlockwise and I2 clockwise hence -V3 = -(14.14+j14.14) = -14.14-j14.14 right ?

scottdave I completely forgot about converting back to polar form.

Thanks for your input guys.
 
kibara said:
gneill V3 = 20 <45 = 14.14 + j14.14 V3 is going anticlockwise and I2 clockwise hence -V3 = -(14.14+j14.14) = -14.14-j14.14 right ?
Right. But in your mesh equations you've written:
kibara said:
mesh2: -V3-I2(Z4+Z5)+I1Z4+I3Z5=0

-14.14+J14.14-I2(J4-J5)+I1(-J5)+I3(J4)=0 eq(2)
(My emphasis in red)

Note that only the first term of that complex number has been negated.
 
  • Like
Likes kibara
Hi. Thanks for all your help. I have now solved for I as follows:

mesh 1: 120-I1(2-j5)+I2(-j5)=0
mesh 2: -14.14-j14.14-I2(-j)+I1(-j5)+I3(j4)=0
mesh 3: -j120-I3(4+j4)+I2(j4)=0

Multiplying (2) by (4+j4) and (3) by (j4)

-j113.12-I2(4-j4)+I1(20-j20)+I3(-16+j16)=0 equation (2A)

480-I3(-16+j16)+I2(-16)=0 equation (3A)

Adding (3A) to (2A)

480-j113.12+I1(20-j20)+I2(-20+j4)=0 equation (4)

Multiplying (1) by (-20+j4) and (4) by (-j5)

-2400+j480-I1(-20+j108)+I2(20+j100)=0 equation(1A)

-565.6-j2400+I1(-100-j100)+I2(20+j100)=0 equation (4A)

Subtracting (4A) from (1A) and solving for I1

-1834.4+j2880+I1(120-j8)=0

I1=16.8119-j22.8792

Substituting value of I1 into equation (1) and solving for I2

I2=25.9636-j40.1544

I=I1-I2=-9.1517+j17.2752 A

or I=19.5496 <117.9128o A

Now moving to node analysis :)
 
Back
Top