Multiphase Flow in Fluid Dynamics - Energy Coupling

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on energy coupling in multiphase flow, specifically the interaction between a continuous phase (like water) and a dispersed phase (like oil droplets). The coupling parameter, which compares the heat released by the droplets to the heat energy of the continuous phase, is derived through equations involving heat transfer and flow dynamics. A key issue arises regarding the simplification of the coupling parameter, where the final result in the referenced book implies a relationship between the specific heats and temperatures of the phases that lacks justification. The conversation also references a related mass transfer problem, drawing parallels in the mathematical treatment of the two phenomena. Clarification is sought on the missing terms in the final equation presented in the book.
Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1
Hello, I have a general question regarding energy coupling in multi phase flow. My question comes is based on the text from this book:

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CioXotlGMiYC&pg=PA33&lpg=PA33&dq=thermal+coupling+parameter+continuous+dispersed&source=bl&ots=s9uWpatRmM&sig=-aRSlKoQXHc7gTlZTsl30ROncfo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjh6-DfhdzSAhVELMAKHfKOBHAQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=thermal coupling parameter continuous dispersed&f=false

(page 33)

This is kind of obscure so I'll provide a quick background:

Basically, the premise of the question is that there is a flow of fluid, the fluid has a continuous phase, and within the continuous there exists a dispersed phase, so something like water flowing with little droplets of oil inside the water. The idea is that, suppose the water is flowing through a pipe and into a control volume. The coupling parameter will compare the effect of the dispersed phase on the control volume to the continuous phases effect. So, a flow of fluid with a continuous phase containing n drops per volume flows into a cubic control volume of length L (a volume of $L^3$).

Energy coupling is related to temperature. So, in energy coupling the two things that are to be compared are:
  • The energy (heat) released by the droplets (the convective heat transfer from droplets to water)
  • The energy provided by the continuous phase (the heat energy of the water)
Thus, the coupling parameter will be:
$$
\Pi_{\text{Energy}} = \frac{\text{Heat Released by Droplets}}{\text{Enthalpy Flux from Water}}
$$
The heat released by the droplets comes from Newtons law of cooling:
$$
mC_d\frac{dT_d}{dt} = Nu k_c \pi D (T_c - T_d)
$$
D is the diameter of the droplet, Tc and Td are the temperatures of the continuous/dispersed phases. Nu is the Nusselt number. Again, there are n droplets per unit volume therefore the total heat released from the droplets is:
$$
nL^3Nu k_c \pi D (T_c - T_d)
$$
The heat flux due to the continuous will just be:
$$
\rho_c u C_c T_c L^2
$$
Which is the density of the continuous phase multiplied by the volume flowing per unit time multiplied by specific heat capacity and it's temperature. The coupling parameter is therefore:
$$
\Pi_{\text{Energy}} = \frac{nL^3Nu k_c \pi D (T_c - T_d)}{\rho_c u C_c T_c L^2}
$$

Ok, so that's all fine and dandy. The issue is when they simplify the above formula. So there exists a thermal response time constant (I do not believe it matters where it comes from, this is basically an algebraic exercise at this point):
$$
\tau_T = \frac{\rho_dC_dD^2}{12k_c}
$$
This can be included in the above equation such that :
$$
\Pi_{\text{Energy}} = \frac{nL^3Nu k_c \pi D (T_c - T_d) \rho_d C_d D^2 \tau_T}{\rho_c u C_c T_c L^2 \tau_T }
$$
This can be cleaned up, Nu/2 can be approximated to 1 at low Reynolds numbers. piD^2/6 multiplied by density of a droplet (spherical) gives the mass of that droplet, multiply that by n and you end up with the total droplet density per unit volume. The above equation simplifies to:
$$
\Pi_{\text{Energy}}= \frac{T_dCLC_d}{uC_c T_C \tau_T } \bigg(1-\frac{T_c}{T_d}\bigg)
$$
Where C is the ratio of total dispersed phase density and continuous phase density.

Here is the problem, the book quotes the final result as:
$$
\Pi_{\text{Energy}}= \frac{CL}{u\tau_T } \bigg(1-\frac{T_c}{T_d}\bigg)
$$
Which implies that:
$$
\frac{C_dT_d}{C_c T_c} = 1
$$

I don't see any justification for that though...does anyone know where the extra terms went?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I worked on a Physics Forums thread very similar to this about a month ago. It was a mass transfer problem rather than a heat transfer problem, but the basic setup was the same. Here is the reference: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cocurrent-diffusion-cant-be-this-hard.904956/
Here is the corresponding analysis for your problem:
If the total volumetric flow rate of continuous and discontinuous phases is F and the volume fraction of disperse phase is f, then Eqns. 1 and 2 can be rewritten as:
$$f\rho_D C_D\frac{dT_D}{dt}=\alpha \phi\tag{1}$$
$$(1-f)\rho_C C_C\frac{dT_C}{dt}=-\alpha \phi\tag{2}$$where t is the cumulative residence time (t = V/F), ##\alpha## is the heat transfer surface per unit volume and ##\phi## is the heat flux through the interface. The heat flux is given by:
$$\phi=\frac{k_CNu}{2R}(T_C-T_D)\tag{3}$$where R is the discontinuous phase drop radius.
The discontinuous phase drop radius R in Eqn. 3 is related to the volume fraction of drops f and the surface area per unit volume ##\alpha## by the equations:
$$4\pi R^2 n=\alpha\tag{4}$$
$$\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3 n=f\tag{5}$$where n is the number of drops per unit volume. If we divide Eqn. 5 by Eqn. 4, we obtain:
$$R=\frac{3f}{\alpha}\tag{6}$$
If we add equation 1 and 2, we find that $$f\rho_D C_DT_D+(1-f)\rho_C C_CT_C=f\rho_D C_DT_{D0}+(1-f)\rho_C C_CT_{C0}\tag{7}$$
Combining Eqns. 1-3 and 6 yields:
$$\frac{dT_D}{dt}=\frac{k_C\ Nu\ \alpha^2}{6f^2\rho_D C_D}(T_C-T_D)\tag{8}$$
$$\frac{dT_C}{dt}=-\frac{k_C\ Nu\ \alpha^2}{6f(1-f)\rho_C C_C}(T_C-T_D)\tag{9}$$
If we subtract Eqns. 8 and 9, we obtain: $$\frac{d\ln(T_D-T_C)}{dt}=-\left[\frac{1}{f\rho_D C_D}+\frac{1}{(1-f)\rho_C C_C}\right]\frac{k_C\ Nu\ \alpha^2}{6f}\tag{10}$$
Hope this helps.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top