How Do Symmetrical Charges Affect Net Electric Field in a Circle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of symmetrical charges on the net electric field in a circular arrangement. It is established that the net electric field in the x-direction cancels out due to symmetry, while the treatment of the y-axis requires careful consideration of angles. Participants emphasize the importance of not making assumptions and instead using geometric reasoning to determine the angles involved. The net electric field is described as the sum of the fields from multiple charges, with the conclusion that the presence of a 2q charge can be treated as two separate q charges. Ultimately, the net electric field is influenced by the arrangement of these charges, particularly in relation to the y-axis.
jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
5 positive point charges are uniformly distributed and fixed around a circle of radius R. Determine the net electric field at the centre of the circle in terms of q and R.
Relevant Equations
-
1580091423802.png


In this case, I know there won't be any net efield in the x direction because it cancels out with each other.
The problem is dealing with the y axis. Am I supposed to presume an angle for each of them or what should I do instead?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that you don't know enough Geometry to calculate the angles you need to know? What is 360/5?
 
I strongly suggest that you stop and think a bit before charging into compute angles. What would the field be if you replaced the 2q charge with a q charge?
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
Orodruin said:
I strongly suggest that you stop and think a bit before charging into compute angles. What would the field be if you replaced the 2q charge with a q charge?
There won't be any net charge. Since it is 2q, I can assume the net efield is only a +q charge lying on the y axis?
 
jisbon said:
There won't be any net charge.
I hope you mean net electric field, there certainly is a net charge and in any point other than the origin you cannot apply the symmetry argument.

jisbon said:
Since it is 2q, I can assume the net efield is only a +q charge lying on the y axis?
You should not assume anythimg, you should argue for your conclusion. But yes, the electric field is additive. The total electric field will be that of five symmetrically positioned q charges and an additional q charge on the y axis.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
Orodruin said:
I hope you mean net electric field, there certainly is a net charge and in any point other than the origin you cannot apply the symmetry argument.You should not assume anythimg, you should argue for your conclusion. But yes, the electric field is additive. The total electric field will be that of five symmetrically positioned q charges and an additional q charge on the y axis.
Yep sorry I meant net efield. If there are 5 q charges positioned as shown, there won't be any net efield because the y and x-axis pretty much cancels out one another. So I can treat the 2q as two separate q charges, then conclude that the net efield is only due to a q charge on the y axis?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top