Prove that tensor is second rank mixed

Mcfly11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



V^alpha and U^beta are both contravariant vectors, and obey the equation V^alpha=E^alpha_beta*U^beta. Show that E^alpha_beta is a mixed second rank tensor. (Note: I couldn't get the latex to work, my apologies for the ugly equations. E^alpha_beta means E with a superscript alpha, and subscript beta.)

Homework Equations


The transformation equation of mixed second rank tensors (kind of a bummer to type without the latex working for me...)

The Attempt at a Solution



The only solution I can come up with assumes that the equation is invariant under coordinate transformation...which doesn't seem valid to me. Basically, I transformed the two vectors V and U into 'barred' coordinates using the standard transformation for contravariant vectors, and substitute that into the equation given...then if the form of the equation is to remain invariant under coordinate transformations, it required that E follows the transformation properties of a second rank mixed tensor. I assume this is altogether invalid due to my assumption of invariance...can anyone offer me a starting point or a tip? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You reasoning is correct. You need to use two things: invariance (or covariance, if you wish), and arbitrariness of V and U. You did not mention the second condition and it was not explicitly stated in the problem. But evidently if that equation should hold only for, say, U=0, V=0, then you would not be able to say anything reasonable about E,
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top