Relation between Electric Potential and Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
The electric field along the x-axis is defined as E = 1.2x - 3.06 N/C. To find the electric potential at (7.22 m, 0) with the potential set to zero at (4.39 m, 0), the potential difference is calculated using the integral of the electric field. The correct calculation yields a potential difference of Vba = -11.054 V, leading to Vb = -11.054 V when Va = 0. This approach clarifies the relationship between electric potential and electric field in the specified region.
Alan I
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a certain region of space, the electric field along the x-axis is given by:

E = 1.2x - 3.06, where E is in N/C and x is in meters.

If you set the electric potential equal to zero at (4.39 m,0), find the electric potential, in V, at the point (7.22 m,0).

Homework Equations


V = - ∫E * dl

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
V = - ∫ (1.2X-3.06) dx

⇒ V = - [1.2X2/2 - 3.06X]02.83

⇒V=3.85 → which is http://www.dabur.com/odomos/images/wrong_sign.jpg :oldfrown: ...any suggestions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the wrong integration boundaries and you are missing the term due to the potential at x = 4.39 m.
 
Alan I said:

Homework Statement


In a certain region of space, the electric field along the x-axis is given by:
E = 1.2x - 3.06, where E is in N/C and x is in meters.
If you set the electric potential equal to zero at (4.39 m,0), find the electric potential, in V, at the point (7.22 m,0).
First, find the potential difference between the two points.
Then set the one to zero & get the other.
 
rude man said:
First, find the potential difference between the two points.
Then set the one to zero & get the other.

potential difference between the two points: Vba = - ∫4.397.22 (1.2X-3.06) dx

⇒ Vba = -[1.2X2/2-3.06X]4.397.22
= -(9.184+1.870)
= -11.054
⇒-11.054 = Vb - Va

Va=0

⇒Vb = -11.054 V

does that make more sense? :olduhh:
 
Alan I said:
potential difference between the two points: Vba = - ∫4.397.22 (1.2X-3.06) dx

⇒ Vba = -[1.2X2/2-3.06X]4.397.22
= -(9.184+1.870)
= -11.054
⇒-11.054 = Vb - Va

Va=0

⇒Vb = -11.054 V

does that make more sense? :olduhh:
A whole lot more! :smile:

P.S. I didn't check the math.
 
  • Like
Likes Alan I
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top