Relationship Between Density and Specific Heat

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between specific heat capacity and density in thermochemistry. It is noted that while there is a general trend where denser substances tend to have lower specific heat capacities, there is no exact relationship. The concept of "equipartition" of energy is introduced, explaining that heat capacities can be understood as contributions from translational, rotational, and vibrational degrees of freedom of molecules. Each of these degrees contributes to the total heat capacity, and this relationship does not directly involve mass. For example, helium and radon have similar heat capacities per mole, but helium has a higher heat capacity per unit mass. The discussion acknowledges that while equipartition is an approximate principle, at typical temperatures, the contributions from translational, rotational, and vibrational states are the most significant, with other factors like electronic and nuclear states being less relevant.
malco97
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am currently studying thermochemistry and specific heat capacity has been discussed. From observing a list in order of specific heat from highest to lowest and then comparing to a list of densities, it seems to me that the denser a substance is, the lower the specific heat. Is this true and if so is there an exact relationship?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Generally, sort of true. Specific relationship? No. What you've tripped over is "equipartition" of energy of a system among the degrees of freedom of the system. Translation: As far as chemists are concerned, heat capacities, or specific heats, can be interpreted as sums of translational, rotational, and vibrational degrees of freedom of molecules; translational and rotational degrees each contribute kT/2 (or, RT/2), and vibrational degrees kT to the total heat capacity. Notice, no mention of mass --- that means, roughly, that the heat capacity per mole of He is the same as that for Rn --- per unit mass, He is higher. Equipartion is approximate --- the vibrational degrees of freedom are not commonly fully excited, and, strictly speaking, you also have to include electronic states, nuclear states, and so on, but at temperatures at which molecules are stable (low energy excited states), you can pretty much ignore everything beyond translation, rotation, and vibration.
 
Thankyou for your reply Bystander and your explanation.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top