Semicircular rod and Electric Potential Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a semicircular rod carrying a uniform charge. For part a, the potential is derived using the integral of the electric potential formula, leading to the conclusion that the potential at the center is kQ/r, where r is determined from the semicircle's geometry. In part b, the challenge is to place a point charge at specific coordinates to achieve zero potential at the center, with the understanding that the potential from the rod does not change due to the presence of the point charge. The conversation clarifies that since the rod is an insulator, the charge density remains constant, simplifying the calculations. Overall, the key takeaway is the method to find electric potential and the implications of charge distribution on the problem.
kevtimc25
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin, flexible rod of length L = 10 cm carries charge Q = 91 nC uniformly along its length. The rod is then bent into a semicircle, as shown in the figure. Show all work and circle answers. a) Find the electrical potential at the center.
b) Now we want to place a single point charge so that the electric potential is zero at the center. What are the coordinates of this charge’s positions (x,y) and what is the charge Q1 needed in Coulombs?

(I can't extract the figure, but its basically a semicircular rod of charge with a point where the center of the full circle would be.)

Homework Equations


U= kQq / r, λ = Q/L, C=2πr

The Attempt at a Solution


Part a.) We take (from 0-L)∫ dU = ∫(k/r)dQ => dQ = λdL, ∫(k/r)λdL => kλ/r * L ]from0-L
= (kλ/r) * L = kQ/r (same as U) , And we calculate r from 2L = 2πr.

But wouldn't the point charge in b) also be affected by the rod, and in that case we would have to vary 'r' as well to find that charge's elect. potential?

Much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) looks like what I'd do.
(b) the potential at a point due to a charge does not depend on the presence of other charges... as your own equation shows.
 
Got it, thanks!
 
... note: it would matter if the rod were a conductor, then it becomes quite a hard problem.
Fortunately you are told that the charge density is a constant - so it must be an insulator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top