Solving Motor Braking Circuit Problem in Bowling Industry

In summary: Interesting, I never saw this scheme before - I wonder how it works......are they switching the start caps from series to parallel and connecting them across the motor run coil, to turn the motor into an induction generator so it'll slow itself down? They must be low ohm... Do they ever get hot?Or maybe I don't understand the scheme at all...
  • #71
This is the resistor. There are two of these One is for the table and one is for the sweep
 

Attachments

  • 20160719_215527.jpg
    20160719_215527.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 341
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #72
H012 said:
It takes me a while to do readings I'm solo working 26 machines.
I'm sorry to be such a pest
just English is so imprecise and i can only imagine how you made the measurement.
Thanks for the expansion , i'll quote it
H012 said:
this with motor running. this reading only occurred milliseconds when motor started to run
AHA That's what it SHOULD do , appear until CS opens then disappear. Caps are in series with start winding until motor gets up to speed
at which time CS disconnects them
so voltage during motor acceleration is proper
and voltage should drop to zero as soon as motor reaches speed and remain there while motor runs
Voltage should return when relay T connects capacitors to motor run winding to decelerate it
then as it's running quickly drops off till the motor stops.
That sounds right.
A reading across capacitorsduring deceleration would cross check your 29 amp reading of a few days ago
29 amps through 1000 uf should make 76 volts

Thanks !

Looking forward to your coil thump test.

Got any neon indicator lamps around ?

Tom - you copy ? Red parts Sound right ?

old jim
 
  • #73
H012 said:
...quickly drops off till the motor stops.

The RC time constant is about 15 milliSeconds so the voltage should be less than 1% of initial reading within 75 milliSeconds of Start winding disconnecting.
If significant voltage remains, either resistor(s) bad, or Start winding not disconnecting.

The presence of a DC voltage strongly points to at least one defective cap.

Jim: re Red: You type faster than I do, I think we said the same thing!

EDIT: phrase in Red
 
  • #74
Correction to Post #73 (#73 has also been edited in red)
Tom.G said:
The presence of a unbalanced DC voltage strongly points to at least one defective cap or resistor.
 
  • #75
The sizing is beyond me at this point.. but I haven't seen the suggestion of adding a cap across the relay contacts that are arcing.. since they're arcing on opening, it would suggest a high voltage spike from the disconnection of the coils, a capacitor across them (evidently with a high voltage rating) could suppress the time and intensity of an arc. Much like the way old points style ignition systems worked, if the condenser was bad, the points burnt up.
 
  • #76
H012 said:
this reading only occurred milliseconds when motor started to run the as it's running quickly drops off till the motor stops.

Just to make sure we're hearing each other

When motor starts you get 22AC and 41 DC but only very briefly ?

then as motor reaches speed , voltage quickly drops off, i presume to near zero but would you confirm or correct me on that ?
Most troubleshooting mistakes arise from presuming what somebody meant to say.

If that's what you saw , brief voltage during start return to near zero, it gives me confidence the circuit is as i imagined it.

Voltage should return while motor coasts down in braking cycle
because capacitors get switched back in by NC contacts on S relay
Aha now relay names Table and Sweep make sense ...

Precision in communication sure is tedious, isn't it ?

But it feels so good to arrive !

Thanks for your work i think we are progressing nicelyold jim
 
  • #77
@H012 One more clarification please.
H012 said:
The only fact I know is that the NC arcing occurs when they open, only because I can see it.
Does "...when they open..." refer to the instant of motor start, or to the instant of motor shutoff. i.e. the NC arcing is at motor start or stop?
 
  • #78
edit--- related observation, no response needed thpugh

Rx7man said:
but I haven't seen the suggestion of adding a cap across the relay contacts that are arcing.. since they're arcing on opening,

there's an open question on which contacts arc vs burn up

from post 45

is the arcing on motor start or motor stop? or both ?

Motor stopping. Reason I can see the arcing is on seven of my machines I have the old style open contact Allen Bradley relays Jim my be familiar with these.

Arcing is on motor stop
NO contacts open on motor stop
NC contacts close on motor stop
it's NC contacts that burn up

so if the arcing is on the contacts that open on stop, it's not on the contacts that are burning up

you're right, I'm focused on the NC contacts
the NO contacts might make a more impressive arc but if so it doesn't appear to be hurting them.

Thanks ! That was one more presumption on my part, that the visible arc was wrecking the contacts,, and "it ain't necessarily so..."

old jim
 
  • #79
Side Comment:

I've had a few requests regarding contact numbering on the 700-series control relays used in this thread. So here goes.

First off, realize there is no such thing as "Double Throw" contacts in industrial control relays. Contact sets are NO (Normally Open) or NC (Normally Closed). If you want Double Throw you wire up a set of NO and a set of NC contacts. Additional options such as Double Break or Overlapped Contact Timing (make-before-break) are available, but they won't be discussed here.

Contacts are numbered with a typically 2-digit number, XX
  1. Right most digit is the 'Form' of the contact and which contact of the set XX
    • "1" and "2" denote a NC contact set with the "1" and "2" showing which of the contacts is referred to
    • "3" and "4" denote a NO contact set with the "3" and "4" showing which of the contacts is referred to
  2. The next digit(s) to the left, XX, are just a sequential numbering of the contact sets

The relay Coil(s) have an uppercase letter as the left-character. "A1" and "A2" would be the two ends of the first coil.

In the specification sheet for a relay you will find both Current rating, "I" (uppercase letter), and Voltage rating, "U" or "V". Where "V" is the American style, and "U" being used most other places.

The above was gathered from sources referencing the International standard IEC 60947-1 and IEC 60947-4-1
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #80
It's not a cheap solution... but a 3 phase VFD and motors would be a 'pretty' solution to this, and would be capable of operating faster... Depending on the lifespan of your current relays, the cost, downtime, etc and if you can get another solution from here, it may be worth it in the end.
 
  • #81
i'd like to see what he feels on the 100 turn coil

if indeed it's a current pulse from the motor that's wrecking the contacts
some sort of snubber seems in order
a couple dozen mh of inductance should tame the inrush
or Svein's few ohm resistor might work really well too

honestly were i designing that machine i'd have sized the contacts for LRA and never given a thought to transient inrush

trial and error
i'll see if i have an old toroid to send him
 
  • #82
jim hardy said:
Just to make sure we're hearing each other

When motor starts you get 22AC and 41 DC but only very briefly ?

then as motor reaches speed , voltage quickly drops off, i presume to near zero but would you confirm or correct me on that ?
Most troubleshooting mistakes arise from presuming what somebody meant to say.

If that's what you saw , brief voltage during start return to near zero, it gives me confidence the circuit is as i imagined it.

Voltage should return while motor coasts down in braking cycle
because capacitors get switched back in by NC contacts on S relay
Aha now relay names Table and Sweep make sense ...

Precision in communication sure is tedious, isn't it ?

But it feels so good to arrive !

Thanks for your work i think we are progressing nicelyold jim
That is what's happening Jim
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #83
H012 said:
That is what's happening Jim
Thanks !
I always struggle with communicating clearly,,,
both in transmitting and receiving
Thank you for all your effort and your patience with my "Twenty Questions"
.. but i have to ask them because I'm quite capable of going off on tangents.

i'm feeling more confidence in my understanding of the circuit now.

Can you see how sparking at the NO contacts compares to sparking at the NC contacts?

On motor start
there shouldn't be much sparking, just contact bounce on the NO's as they conduct motor starting current, maybe thirty amps
the NC's open then but they aren't carrying current so no sparks on them

but on motor stop
there'll be a spark at NO's as they open interrupting motor running current of probably six amps
AND some spark at the NC's as they close and bounce with whatever transient current the motor is pushing through the capacitors...
... if your coil 'jumps' it means that transient current is substantial
dont know yet how to measure it
but maybe we'll just try to suppress it...

This is interesting
and i hope you don't yet regret asking us !

old jim
 
  • #84
jim hardy said:
Thanks !
I always struggle with communicating clearly,,,
both in transmitting and receiving
Thank you for all your effort and your patience with my "Twenty Questions"
.. but i have to ask them because I'm quite capable of going off on tangents.

i'm feeling more confidence in my understanding of the circuit now.

Can you see how sparking at the NO contacts compares to sparking at the NC contacts?

On motor start
there shouldn't be much sparking, just contact bounce on the NO's as they conduct motor starting current, maybe thirty amps
the NC's open then but they aren't carrying current so no sparks on them

but on motor stop
there'll be a spark at NO's as they open interrupting motor running current of probably six amps
AND some spark at the NC's as they close and bounce with whatever transient current the motor is pushing through the capacitors...
... if your coil 'jumps' it means that transient current is substantial
dont know yet how to measure it
but maybe we'll just try to suppress it...

This is interesting
and i hope you don't yet regret asking us !

old jim
Jim I tried that inductor 100 turns 18 ga. I can't tell if it's jumping with the machine shaking when it's operating. It is a bad place I have to put it the way the wire duct is.
 
  • #85
H012 said:
Jim I tried that inductor 100 turns 18 ga. I can't tell if it's jumping with the machine shaking when it's operating. It is a bad place I have to put it the way the wire duct is.
okay thanks for the try..

back later
 
  • #86
jim hardy said:
okay thanks for the try..

back later
Hey Jim with the volts seeming ok. and current from what I understand is ok. Where is this leading us? In you guys opinion? It seems a paradox.
 
  • #87
I still think our trouble stems from closing a switch(NC contacts) between a power source(motor) and discharged capacitors(those 500uf's)

the surge current is less than i thought else it would have shaken your coil
but it flows through contacts that are in the process of closing and aren't fully made

http://pdfserv.maximintegrated.com/en/an/AN764.pdf
Switch Bounce
...
As a switch changes state, its contacts travel through several open-close cycles called "contact bounce"
before coming to rest in the final state. In some cases, this rapid contact bounce produces a changing
resistance as the moving contact wipes across the stationary contact.

here's a 'scope trace(from a different source) of contact bounce on closure - each bounce makes an arc
typical bouncing time is about a millisecond
contact separation on opening is much cleaner
jh

upload_2016-7-21_5-44-51.png


Lamp and capacitive loads represent the worst case. At the instant of switch closure, both of these loads
subject the switch to a short circuit. A lamp's cold resistance is close to 0Ω, and a discharged capacitor
is a short circuit at the instant voltage is applied! This state change can produce inrush currents up to
100 times the steady-state value. To compound the problem, switch contacts are bouncing during this
short-circuit interval. High current levels and bouncing contacts produce severe arcing across the switch
contacts that causes contact erosion. What's worse is that repeated cycles of switch operation with
severe arcing can create a short circuit by welding (fusing) the contacts together

think of your motor as a generator and those capacitors as its load. Capacitive inrush is i think our trouble.

What's the "make" current rating of that relay contact?
http://www.aeroelectric.com/Reference_Docs/Tyco/Tyco-Relay_Contact_Life.pdf
Material loss is due primarily to splattering of the molten and boiling
metal as contacts bounce on make. Such loss can be significant over
the course of tens of thousands of operations, and the only practical
way to minimize it is by arc suppression. Arc suppression quickly
quenches the arc, thereby holding contact temperatures lower.

so i'd like to limit the inrush to those capacitors

do you think we could experiment with some impedance where we showed it, and see if it slows the coastdown too much ?

bowlingalley4-jpg.103375.jpg


Inductance has the appeal of elegance, but i do suffer from idealism
two or three ohms of resistance might do the trick
as Svein and Tom.G have suggested
@Tom.G thoughts?
 
  • #88
jim hardy said:
I still think our trouble stems from closing a switch(NC contacts) between a power source(motor) and discharged capacitors(those 500uf's)

the surge current is less than i thought else it would have shaken your coil
but it flows through contacts that are in the process of closing and aren't fully made
think of your motor as a generator and those capacitors as its load. Capacitive inrush is i think our trouble.

What's the "make" current rating of that relay contact?so i'd like to limit the inrush to those capacitors

do you think we could experiment with some impedance where we showed it, and see if it slows the coastdown too much ?

bowlingalley4-jpg.103375.jpg


Inductance has the appeal of elegance, but i do suffer from idealism
two or three ohms of resistance might do the trick
as Svein and Tom.G have suggested
@Tom.G thoughts?
If you look at post #59 JPG go down to line AC-15 This gives the Make/Break of contacts. I will go down to the local to local electronics store
and pick up some resistors. I think Svein suggested 8 ohm 50 watt I will see what lower resistance ones they have. I loved Radio shack back
in the day. I could get anything for electronics. Thanks guys!
 
  • #89
Paralleling two 8's makes a 4, three a 2&2/3, etc
There's some number of ohms that'll slow the coastdown enough to upset the mechanical timing
when you try one measure the voltage across it , initial when NC contacts close.While you're there, pick up a motor run capacitor, maybe maybe 10 uf, not critical should be cheap i bought a 10 yesterday for $3.

We never established unambiguously at which contacts you see the arcing on motor stop - middle NC's or outside NO's ?
If you can see arcing on NC's when they close , we at least have a visible indication of any improvement we make.

Might be worth trying to limit rate of voltage rise across motor in interval between NC's open and NC's close, also during contact bounce time
bowlingsweep3.jpg

that'd be your motor run cap in red... resistor sees 1/4 amp continuous so should be a couple watts to stay cool

i tend to study things to death
you are where you can see what's going on
so don't hesitate to apprise us of anything you notice !
...

just noticed
Aha 1.5 ohms main winding ? We should be able to add at least that much which could halve your surge current
question is what's max we can add before motor coasts too far? We have to stay well below that.
....
Figuring Inductance is a little tougher, we'll have to estimate how many volts it has to hold back for how many microseconds.

If we say it only has to hold off 150 volts for a millisecond while contacts stop bouncing
and limit current rise to 30 amps while that millisecond elapses
then we have di/dt = 30 amps per millisecond = 30ka/second
at 150 volts
e = L X di/dt
so
L = 150 / 30,000 = 5 millihenries
we were perhaps ⅓ of the way there with your 100 turn coil
and 30 amps wouldn't have shook the coil very hard

did you notice any change in sparks ?

<<<<<<<<<<end chasing too many 'thought rabbits' at once..>>>>>>>> for now
 
Last edited:
  • #90
H012 said:
If you look at post #59 JPG go down to line AC-15 This gives the Make/Break of contacts.

Thanks - they tested it at 10X rated current for 6050 cycles, ten cycles per minute is how i read that.

How long does it take you to accumulate six thousand cycles? Do they have counters?
Sure wish we could measure that initial burst of current to capacitors

Ahh we'll get there !

old jim
 
  • #91
here's a formula for inductance of a coil with no iron core
http://home.earthlink.net/~jimlux/hv/wheeler.htm
Multi layer air core solenoid
L (uH) = 0.8 * a^2 * n^2 / (6*a + 9*b + 10*c )

where
a = average radius of windings
b = length of the coil
c = difference between the outer and inner radii of the coil.
all dimensions in inches

It states that it is accurate to 1% when the terms in the denominator are
about equal. This is also an equation by Wheeler. It applies as long as the
coil has a rectangular cross section..

cross checked at
http://66pacific.com/calculators/coil_calc.aspxi get ~1.45 mh for 100 turns on 4'' diameter if i typed right
200 turns would be 5.8 mh
a core would be nice
the toroid from an old computer or inverter type microwave oven seems right flavor , we're blocking high frequency transients
i'll check my junkpile
 
  • #92
jim hardy said:
Paralleling two 8's makes a 4, three a 2&2/3, etc
There's some number of ohms that'll slow the coastdown enough to upset the mechanical timing
when you try one measure the voltage across it , initial when NC contacts close.While you're there, pick up a motor run capacitor, maybe maybe 10 uf, not critical should be cheap i bought a 10 yesterday for $3.

We never established unambiguously at which contacts you see the arcing on motor stop - middle NC's or outside NO's ?
If you can see arcing on NC's when they close , we at least have a visible indication of any improvement we make.

Might be worth trying to limit rate of voltage rise across motor in interval between NC's open and NC's close, also during contact bounce time
View attachment 103603
that'd be your motor run cap in red... resistor sees 1/4 amp continuous so should be a couple watts to stay cool

i tend to study things to death
you are where you can see what's going on
so don't hesitate to apprise us of anything you notice !
...

just noticed
Aha 1.5 ohms main winding ? We should be able to add at least that much which could halve your surge current
question is what's max we can add before motor coasts too far? We have to stay well below that.
....
Figuring Inductance is a little tougher, we'll have to estimate how many volts it has to hold back for how many microseconds.

If we say it only has to hold off 150 volts for a millisecond while contacts stop bouncing
and limit current rise to 30 amps while that millisecond elapses
then we have di/dt = 30 amps per millisecond = 30ka/second
at 150 volts
e = L X di/dt
so
L = 150 / 30,000 = 5 millihenries
we were perhaps ⅓ of the way there with your 100 turn coil
and 30 amps wouldn't have shook the coil very hard

did you notice any change in sparks ?

<<<<<<<<<<end chasing too many 'thought rabbits' at once..>>>>>>>> for now
Jim I have 3 of these. 2.7, 3.0 and 8.2 25% The 50 watt were outragous in price not to mention their size.
 

Attachments

  • 20160721_152308.jpg
    20160721_152308.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 357
  • #93
H012 said:
Jim I have 3 of these. 2.7, 3.0 and 8.2 25% The 50 watt were outragous in price not to mention their size.
I will check I have some run caps not sure of their capacitance
 
  • #94
H012 said:
Jim I have 3 of these. 2.7, 3.0 and 8.2 25% The 50 watt were outragous in price not to mention their size.
Since they only carry current during coastdown they can be less wattage than 6 amps continuous would require .

If you can see sparks on the NC's that's our best quick indication of improvement .

Try them all one at a time and see if coastdown gets longer, question is " does the thing still stop in right place...?."
If it tolerates 8 ohms that should help contact life considerably !
If you can read voltage across caps during coastdown before and after it'll tell us how much we changed braking current.

Then i guess we'd have to outfit a machine with one, install a new relay and run it for the usual life of a relay, inspect contacts to see if we reduced erosion.

If you can see sparking that's great, we can try the resistor- capacitor snubber across motor and see right away.
If you can't see sparking we could try that long term test on another machine.

Another "poor man's" test equipment is an el-cheapo AM pocket radio set between stations. It'll pick up any arcing.
You might get a clue to the intensity of arcing from how much static you hear at relay operate time. A bad contact will likely make static all the time it's conducting.
We use that in the power plant for surveying big motors, when they start to develop corona they get "transistor-radio-active" .

I envy you this experimenting, how far are you from Northeast Arkansas ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy,_Arkansas
 
  • #95
jim hardy said:
Since they only carry current during coastdown they can be less wattage than 6 amps continuous would require .

If you can see sparks on the NC's that's our best quick indication of improvement .

Try them all one at a time and see if coastdown gets longer, question is " does the thing still stop in right place...?."
If it tolerates 8 ohms that should help contact life considerably !
If you can read voltage across caps during coastdown before and after it'll tell us how much we changed braking current.

Then i guess we'd have to outfit a machine with one, install a new relay and run it for the usual life of a relay, inspect contacts to see if we reduced erosion.

If you can see sparking that's great, we can try the resistor- capacitor snubber across motor and see right away.
If you can't see sparking we could try that long term test on another machine.

Another "poor man's" test equipment is an el-cheapo AM pocket radio set between stations. It'll pick up any arcing.
You might get a clue to the intensity of arcing from how much static you hear at relay operate time. A bad contact will likely make static all the time it's conducting.
We use that in the power plant for surveying big motors, when they start to develop corona they get "transistor-radio-active" .

I envy you this experimenting, how far are you from Northeast Arkansas ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardy,_Arkansas
I'm in New Jersey. I'm from smokey moutain region of Tenn. Me and my wife are out of here in 3yrs. max! Hate it here but work is good. Cost of living is outragous!. Ok will give resistors a shot. Got to do machine maitenance first.
 
  • #96
H012 said:
Got to do machine maitenance first.

You're talking to a retired maintenance man...

i really hope this helps out

Fair Anne and I and I considered East Tennessee for retirement
but settled in the Ozarks

Further west we get the better we like it
when i cross that Mississippi bridge in Memphis i start to get that "far from the madding crowd" feeling.
It really kicks in about Laramie Wyoming.
 
  • Like
Likes Rx7man
  • #97
jim hardy said:
You're talking to a retired maintenance man...

i really hope this helps out

Fair Anne and I and I considered East Tennessee for retirement
but settled in the Ozarks

Further west we get the better we like it
when i cross that Mississippi bridge in Memphis i start to get that "far from the madding crowd" feeling.
It really kicks in about Laramie Wyoming.
That's how my wife JoAnn and I feel too. Had enough raising kids and yes the rat race
Too. Anyway got a full house here at work. I will try later to get the resistor in. Got to solder 12 inch wire on each end off resistor
To reach into wire duct.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #98
jim hardy said:
I still think our trouble stems from closing a switch(NC contacts) between a power source(motor) and discharged capacitors(those 500uf's)

the surge current is less than i thought else it would have shaken your coil
but it flows through contacts that are in the process of closing and aren't fully made
think of your motor as a generator and those capacitors as its load. Capacitive inrush is i think our trouble.

What's the "make" current rating of that relay contact?so i'd like to limit the inrush to those capacitors

do you think we could experiment with some impedance where we showed it, and see if it slows the coastdown too much ?

bowlingalley4-jpg.103375.jpg


Inductance has the appeal of elegance, but i do suffer from idealism
two or three ohms of resistance might do the trick
as Svein and Tom.G have suggested
@Tom.G thoughts?
Hey Jim can you help with the resistor location. The C1 33 to TS 12 is the table. Could you show where using the sweep schematic?. Thanks
 
  • #99
H012 said:
Could you show where using the sweep schematic?. Thanks
somewhere in the pink line
in place of that wire from C1-23N to TS-27
or C1-23N to whichever terminal that is on the S relay, 10 or 32
bowlingsweep4.jpg


Schematic shows a wire between relay S terminals 2, 4 and 5
that could be a convenient place if you can see clearly how they accomplished their wiring,
just be careful , you don't want it on the wrong side of terminal 4 !
if there's a single wire on 5 find its other end, hopefully it's a short jumper to 4&2. ( with a single wire from one of those to C1-22J , that's how i woulda done it. )

even between junction of capacitors and centertap of resistor would be okay

schematics don't look a lot like the physical machine, do they ... Got a cellphone picture of it you could upload ?

old jim
 
Last edited:
  • #100
gonna try to reload touchpad driver - back in a while

old jim

got it downloaded but windows won't recognize it, ... what else is new.

anyhow approaching bedtime here, looking forward to your results
 
Last edited:
  • #101
jim hardy said:
somewhere in the pink line
in place of that wire from C1-23N to TS-27
or C1-23N to whichever terminal that is on the S relay, 10 or 32
View attachment 103634

Schematic shows a wire between relay S terminals 2, 4 and 5
that could be a convenient place if you can see clearly how they accomplished their wiring,
just be careful , you don't want it on the wrong side of terminal 4 !
if there's a single wire on 5 find its other end, hopefully it's a short jumper to 4&2. ( with a single wire from one of those to C1-22J ) that's how i woulda done it.

even between junction of capacitors and centertap of resistor would be okay

schematics don't look a lot like the physical machine, do they ... Got a cellphone picture of it you could upload ?

old jim
Hell no! It doesn't look close HaHa. Never does. Bet you've seen your share of wiring
Nightmares. Yes I will get a picture not sure if I can fit it all in one picture.
 
  • #102
@H012 When you get a chance, would you tell us the make & model of the old style, open frame, relay that was originally in the circuit? We are still trying to track down some ambiguities/inconsistencies into the root cause(s) of your problem. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #103
Tom.G said:
@H012 When you get a chance, would you tell us the make & model of the old style, open frame, relay that was originally in the circuit? We are still trying to track down some ambiguities/inconsistencies into the root cause(s) of your problem. Thanks.
I have no idea what the model number they are. I can look on one when I go to work today at 3 pm. These relays are obsolete and I'm phasing them out as OSHA won't allow any open frame design be used unless it's a totally enclosed, which in the case of the chassis on the machine that has the relays is not enclosed. I will send a photo also. I know they are Allen Bradley. Thanks
 
  • #104
H012 said:
I have no idea what the model number they are. I can look on one when I go to work today at 3 pm. These relays are obsolete and I'm phasing them out as OSHA won't allow any open frame design be used unless it's a totally enclosed, which in the case of the chassis on the machine that has the relays is not enclosed. I will send a photo also. I know they are Allen Bradley. Thanks
I am concentrating on the sweep because the sweep starts and stops 3 times unlike the table which starts and stops once. If you would be interested you can go on you tube and search AMF 8270 or 8290 pinspotter I'm sure you can see how it functions.This would be just FYI
 
  • #105
Tom.G said:
@H012 When you get a chance, would you tell us the make & model of the old style, open frame, relay that was originally in the circuit? We are still trying to track down some ambiguities/inconsistencies into the root cause(s) of your problem. Thanks.
They are Allen Bradley 700-C220X10
 

Attachments

  • 20160722_151746.jpg
    20160722_151746.jpg
    73.2 KB · Views: 403

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
15
Views
17K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top