Static equilibrium: Placing a fulcrum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the position of a fulcrum in static equilibrium, specifically when balancing weights on a bar. The fulcrum should ideally be placed under the center of gravity, but its exact position can be calculated using the weights at both ends and the center of gravity. Participants emphasize that engineers typically do not guess the fulcrum's position; instead, they choose points that simplify calculations, such as selecting a location where unknown forces act to eliminate their torque from the equations. The importance of ensuring that the sum of torques around any point equals zero is highlighted as a fundamental principle in static equilibrium. Overall, systematic approaches to solving these problems are preferred over random assumptions.
archaic
Messages
688
Reaction score
214
Homework Statement
A 0.140-kg, 45.4-cm-long uniform bar has a small 0.050-kg mass glued to its left end and a small 0.100-kg mass glued to the other end. You want to balance this system horizontally on a fulcrum placed just under its center of gravity.
How far from the left end should the fulcrum be placed?
Relevant Equations
##\sum\tau=0##
I don't understand the question; they're telling me that the fulcrum is just under the center of gravity of the bar, but that I also need to find its position.
In any case, I suppose that the fulcrum's position is ##x##.
Untitled.png

Let the weight at the left end be ##w_1##, at the right end be ##w_2##, and of the center of gravity be ##w##.
Since ##w_2>w_1##, I'm going to suppose that ##x>\frac l2##.
$$w(x-\frac l2)+w_1x=w_2(l-x)\\x=l\frac{w_2+\frac w2}{w+w_1+w_2}=45.4\times\frac{0.100+\frac{0.140}{2}}{0.140+0.100+0.050}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, this is correct. I have first mindlessly put ##x## randomly less than ##l/2## and worked that way.
 
Generally, do engineers balancing such systems check from which side of the center of gravity the sum of the forces' component contributing to rotation is greater before setting up the equation? Or there is a systematic way?
 
If it isn’t moving the sum of the torques about any point must be zero. Pick a point, pick a sign convention for the torques, and the answer will come out right no matter what point you pick. Engineers don’t generally try to guess the right point. Instead they generally pick a point to make the math easy. For example, if there’s a force you don’t know use it’s location as the center of rotation and it’s torque is zero no matter what the magnitude. It drops out of the calculation. Similarly pick a place where several forces act to get them all out. Perhaps most the forces are perpendicular but one is at an unknown angle and you don’t want to have to figure out the components. Choose that as the origin. Etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top