The average rate of energy loss resulting from internal friction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the average rate of energy loss resulting from internal friction in a motor vehicle's engine transmission. Participants explore various aspects of the problem, including kinetic energy calculations, work done against friction, and the relationship between power and energy loss. The context includes homework-related inquiries and technical reasoning regarding energy dynamics in a vehicle during acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the total increase in kinetic energy as 245.25 x 10^3 J, while another participant expresses uncertainty about this result and requests the calculations.
  • Work done against road friction and air resistance is calculated as 44820 N*m by one participant, prompting discussions about the accuracy of this figure.
  • Participants discuss the need to find the average rate of energy loss from internal friction, with one suggesting that the wheels may be ignored in the calculations.
  • There is a proposal to calculate input power using angular acceleration and torque, but some participants express difficulty in achieving the correct result.
  • One participant mentions needing to convert energy values from joules to kilowatts, leading to further inquiries about the conversion process and the necessary time duration for acceleration.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of understanding that power and rate of energy loss share the same dimensions, suggesting that knowing the time duration can help determine average power.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the calculations or the correct approach to finding the average rate of energy loss. Multiple competing views and methods are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the final calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in their calculations, such as the treatment of the wheels and the need for accurate time duration to convert energy to power. There are also mentions of rounding and significant figures that may affect the results.

Franklie001
Messages
49
Reaction score
7
Summary:: Having the following dates:

1589625159009.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting, but not so interesting that it merits posting twice !

:welcome:

Is there anything you want to ask ? To get help with homework, read this first
 
Last edited:
Hi,
sorry I'm new here.

Do you know how to find the average energy loss in the question posted by me at letter c?

I've found the work done= 44820J (996*45)

Kinetic energy of engine trasmission= 40500J

Hope you can help me.
 
Franklie001 said:
question posted
Sure, but on my screen I can't read it. What is the problem statement, and what are the given data?
 
:welcome:

It does take time to learn the rules of a new place.

First, no duplicate threads (I'll delete the duplicate.). Second, homework goes in the homework forum (I moved it for you.) Third, to get homework help, you must first show us your work. Our helpers help. They don't do the work for you. That's what @BvU meant below.

So, don't get discouraged. Show us your work, and we'll try to provide some help.
BvU said:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • A motor vehicle has a mass of 1·8 Tonnes, its wheels each have a moment of Inertia of 0·8kgm2 and their effective radius is 0·4m. The engine and transmission have an effective moment of Inertia of 0·9kgm2 [referred to the engine shaft]. The speed of rotation of the engine is 8 times that of the wheels.
The vehicle accelerates uniformly from 20m/s to 25m/s while covering a distance of 45m. During this time the average indicated power of the engine is 160kW and the effective road friction and air resistance is equivalent to a constant retarding force of 996N.
Determine:

  • The total increase in kinetic energy.

  • The work done against road friction and air resistance.

  • The average rate of energy loss resulting from the internal friction in the engine transmission.



  • Engine & Transmission
    I = 0.9 Kgm2
    Engine Speed of Rotation = 8 x Wheel Speed
  • Road Friction + Air Resistance = 996 N
  • Mass of Vehicle
    1.8 Tonne
  • Wheels
    I = 0.8 Kgm2
    r = 0.4 m
  • Other Data

    Initial Velocity = 20 m/s
    Final Velocity = 25 m/s
    Distance = 45 m
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
I've already found the first question with 245.25*10^3J and the second at 44820 N*m by the way
 
Franklie001 said:
245.25*10^3J
That's strange: I found something different. Can you post your work ?

[edit]never mind, I still have something left to do :nb). Hold on...
[edit2]No: tried left and right (i.e. include change in kinetic energy of rotation as well:rolleyes: )
but can't find what you found. In sucha case we always ask: post what you did ...

And a small comment: use a space between a number and the unit
And another small comment: you were given data in 1 or 2 digits, so answers (*) should be in 2 or max 3 digits

(*) only the answer you hand in. Intermediary results should not be rounded off.
 
Last edited:
Ok let's start from question 1:

For question 1, I calculated all the difference of kinetical energy of vehicle, engine- trasmission and 4 wheels.

KE Vehicle
u=20 m/s , v=25 m/s

KE= 1/2 * v^2 * m - 1/2 * u^2 * m
KE= (1/2 * 25 ^2 * 1.8 x 10^3) - (1/2 * 20^2 * 1.8 x 10^3) = 202.5 * 10^3 J

Four Wheels KE
Inertia=0.8 kg m^2 (one wheel)
r=0.4m

Inertia for 4 wheels= Inertia x 4 = 0.8 * 4=3.2 kg m^2

Rotational velocities convertion:
W2= v2/r = 25/0.4 = 62.5 rad/s
W1= v1/r = 20/0.4= 50 rad /s

KE=(1/2 * (I * 4) * W2 ^2) - (1/2 * (I*4) * W1 ^2)
KE= (1/2 * 3.2 * 62.5 ^2) - (1/2 * 3.2 * 50 ^2)
KE= 6250 - 4000 = 2250 J

Engine Trasmission
I=0.9 kgm^2

Speed of rotation= 8 * Wheel speed
W2 trasm.= 8 * W2 = 8 * 62.5= 500 rad/s
W1 trasm.= 8 * W1= 8 * 50= 400 rad/s

KE= (1/2 * I * W2 ^2) - (1/2 * I * W1^2)
KE= (1/2 * 0.9 * 500^2) - ( 1/2 * 0.9 * 400^2)
KE= 112500-72000= 40500 J

Total kinetic energy= (202.5 * 10^3) + 2250+ 40500 = 245 x 10^3 J
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #10
b) Work done= Force x distance

Work= 996 * 45= 44820 N*m

c) For question c I tried different ways calculating powers and subtract them but I still can't get the right result.

Any advice?

Thanks for your help
 
  • #11
You're doing better than I am o:) ! Finally reproduced your a) result :cool: (had a typo in excel...)..

Franklie001 said:
still can't get the right result.
Apparently you already know what is the right result.

What did you do te almost get it ? Please post :smile:

Franklie001 said:
The average rate of energy loss resulting from the internal friction in the engine transmission.
I suppose the wheels can be ignored, or else they mean 'including the wheels'...

So you need an energy input, the kinetic energy increase from a) and a delta time ...
 
  • #12
Hi,

Sorry what you mean by I need an energy input. kinetic energy from a and delta time?

Which formula should I use?
 
  • #13
Honestly I started calculating the input power finding the angular acceleration and the torque after but after I time it with the inertia given I don't get the result with is 14.965 KW
 
  • #14
The power input is given
Franklie001 said:
During this time the average indicated power of the engine is 160kW
It is used to add kinetic energy (a), to overcome road friction and air resistance (b) and the remainder is (c).

All you need to find out to convert your 245250 J and and 44820 J to kW. How does one do that ?
 
  • #15
How do I convert joules to kW?
 
  • #16
I am really sorry to bother you.

I appreciate your help by the way
 
  • #17
Franklie001 said:
How do I convert joules to kW?
$$ 1 \ {\sf W} = 1 \ {\sf J/s}$$

160 kW means 160000 Joules per second

To convert your 245250 J change in kinetic energy to kW, and idem the 44820 J, you need to know how long the acceleration lasted.
For that, you have two givens: the change in speed and the distance covered. Need I say more ?

And you are not bothering anyone ! We are here to help.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Do I need to sum the two converted energy? And what after?
 
  • #19
Will you be able to provide me the steps to use to find the result, with the right formula?

Thanks
 
  • #20
Yes I can, but that doesn't help you. I am trying to guide you to help you find the answer yourself.
So please answer:

Is it clear to you hat power and rate of energy loss have the same dimension: energy/time, so that, if you have the time you can determine the (average) power ?

Can you find out how long the acceleration lasted ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Franklie001
  • #21
Thank you

I found the right solution
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K