The net electric field at point A is 6.7x10^4Nm.

AI Thread Summary
The net electric field at point A is calculated to be 6.7 x 10^4 Nm, derived from the contributions of two negative charges. The electric field from charge 1 is vertical, contributing no x-component, while charge 2 is horizontal, contributing no y-component. The calculations involve using the formula Enet = k(q1/r^2 + q2/r^2), resulting in a total electric field of -6.0 x 10^4 Nm from the charges. It is emphasized that electric fields are vectors and should be added vectorially, leading to the final net electric field calculation. The discussion highlights the importance of considering components when charges are positioned along different axes.
chef99
Messages
75
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Calculate the net electric field at point A.

unnamed.jpg

Homework Equations


Enet(total)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The electric field at point A will due to charge 2 will point towards charge 2 because charge 2 is negative.
The electric field at point A will due to charge 1 will point towards charge 1 because charge 1 is negative.

Enet(total) = Enetx + Enety
Because q1 is vertical, its x-component is 0. Because q2 is horizontal, its y-component is 0. Therefore,

Enet = kq1/r^2 + kq2/r^2

= (9.0x10^9Nm/C)(-6.0x10^-5C) / (3.0m)^2 + (9.0x10^9Nm/C)(-3.0x10^-5 C) / (3.0m)^2
= -60000Nm
= -6.0x10^4Nm
The electric field at point A due to the other charges is -6.0x10^4Nm


I am unsure if this is correct as this is the first time I've done a question when it hasn't been an equilateral triangle, so I don't know if I have the right idea or not. Also, I am unsure if I need to determine the angle of charge A or not. Any help is greatly appreciated.

**I am new to the forum so apologies for any errors in the format of my question.
 

Attachments

  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 758
Physics news on Phys.org
chef99 said:
Enet = kq1/r^2 + kq2/r^2

Do you know that Electric field is a vector, and so you have to add it vectorially?
 
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Do you know that Electric field is a vector, and so you have to add it vectorially?
I know the field is a vector, but do I still have to do the x- and y-components first if the direction of the two charges fall on the vertical and horizontal axis, as they appear in the diagram? i.e. Would the x-component for q1 not be zero?
 
Q1 will contribute no x component, Q2 will contribute no y component. But You have to Add them like $$ E_{net} ~=~\sqrt{ {E_x}^2+ {E_y}^2 } $$
 
  • Like
Likes chef99
PumpkinCougar95 said:
Q1 will contribute no x component, Q2 will contribute no y component. But You have to Add them like $$ E_{net} ~=~\sqrt{ {E_x}^2+ {E_y}^2 } $$

So Enet = √60000Nm^2 + 30000Nm^2

Enet = 67082
Enet = 6.7 x10^4Nm
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top