Thermodynamics question regarding latent heat of fusion of ice.

Bigdutchman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(a) An insulated copper container of mass 0.250 kg contains 0.350 kg water. Both the container and the water are initially at 25.0 0C. Then 0.012 kg of ice at 0.0 0C is added to the container. Eventually the container and contents reach thermal equilibrium at 21.7 0C.

(i) What is the total heat released (in J) by the copper container and the 0.350 kg water as they cool down from 25.0 0C to 21.7 0C?

I got 5154.104J (Correct answer)


(ii) Determine the latent heat of fusion of ice. <---- Can't do this mofo. Keep getting different answer. They have 3.39x10^5 J/kg. Can someone pls show me how they got that? THANKS!



Homework Equations


Q=mc delta T
Q=mL


The Attempt at a Solution


One of my failed attempts:
5154/0.012 = 4.29x10^5 J/kg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not taking into account the heat lost by the copper and the water.

AM
 
how do i do that? lol
 
Bigdutchman said:
how do i do that? lol
If the copper changes temperature by \Delta T how much heat does it lose? Do the same for water.

AM
 
Q = mL for state changes. (mass, L being the heat needed, which is what you're trying to find)

and for heating of liquids, Q = mC * change in temp

heat lost by copper = -heat lost by water (i.e. heat is gained by water)
mC * change in temp for copper = - (mL + mC * change in temp for water)

rearrange to find L
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top