Uniform Accelerated Motion - Ticker Tape Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The ticker tape experiment aimed to demonstrate uniform accelerated motion of a cart on an incline, but the resulting velocity-time graph indicated otherwise. The data collected showed increasing velocities that suggested non-uniform acceleration, with calculated average velocities varying significantly across intervals. Suggestions for improvement included ensuring a gentler incline to minimize friction and achieve more consistent acceleration. It was noted that the calculations for velocity were correct, but the steepness of the incline likely hindered the expected uniformity. Adjusting the incline and reducing friction could lead to more accurate results in future experiments.
Iniuria12
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm currently trying to do an experiment of a cart coasting down an incline plane using ticker tape. The ticker tape is set up so that the space between each dot represents 0.02 s. That being said, between every 5th dot would represent 0.1 second.

I know that the point of this experiment is to prove that the cart has Uniform Accelerated Motion, however, using the data that I have obtained, my Velocity-Time graphs say otherwise. Below is the data I have:

Position (cm) | Time (s)
0.000 cm 0.000 s
0.5 cm 0.100 s
1.5 cm 0.200 s
3.3 cm 0.300 s
5.7 cm 0.400 s
9.2 cm 0.500 s
13.6 cm 0.600 s

From that information I am able to find the Interval Displacement
d=p2-p1 so:

First = 0.5 cm - 0.0 cm = 0.5 cm
Second = 1.5 cm - 0.5 cm = 1.0 cm
Third = 3.3 cm - 1.5 cm = 1.8 cm
Fourth = 5.7 cm - 3.3 cm = 2.4 cm
Fifth = 9.2 cm - 5.7 cm = 3.5 cm
Sixth = 13.6 cm - 9.2 cm = 4.4 cm

Using the Interval Displacement information, I can then find the Average Velocities: V=change of D/ change of T

First = 0.5cm / 0.1 s = 5 cm/s
Second = 1.0 cm / 0.1 s = 10 cm/s
Third = 1.8 cm / 0.1 s = 18 cm/s
Fourth = 2.4 cm / 0.1 s = 24 cm/s
Fifth = 3.5 cm / 0.1 s = 35 cm/s
Sixth = 4.4 cm / 0.1 s = 44 cm/s

Knowing that the Vi at the midpoints of the intervals is equal to the Average velocity, they would be representative of the same answers.

Mid-point intervals:
First = 0.05 s
Second = 0.15 s
Third = 0.25 s
Fourth = 0.35 s
Fifth = 0.45 s
Sixth = 0.55 s

Now after calculating all this information and plotting into a Velocity Time Graph both by hand, and also from using Data Studio and Graphical Analysis, I come up with the same answers. They are not representative of an object with Uniform Acceleration. If they were, then the V-T graph would be a straight line moving upwards to the right. My line is more or less upwards to the right but not at a constant velocity, they change at every second.

Does anyone know what I might have done wrong with this experiment?? I'm not looking for anyone to give me the correct answers, as I would like to find them on my own, but any suggestions as to where I messed up, miscalculated, used wrong information etc.. PLEASE HELP,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have calculated the velocity correctly but then you need to take the differences between the velocity at each tinterval,
First-second = 5-10 = 5cm/s
Second-third = 10-18 = 8cm/s
Third-forth = 18 - 24 = 6cm/s
Fourth-fifth = 24-35 = 11cm/s
Fifth-sixth = 35 - 44 = 9cm/s
So accelaration is reasonably constant, at slow speeds you have a bit of friction.
 
You haven't done any calculations wrong its just that you must have had an incline that was too steep to achieve uniform acceleration. The gradient must be slight, and when the trolly is on the slope it must only be at the point of tipping. (so its not moving) just enough of a gradient to counteract the friction.

hope this helped.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top