Very simple high school phisics question

AI Thread Summary
A stationary object explodes into two fragments, with one 4.0 kg fragment moving west at 3.0 m/s. The remaining 2.0 kg fragment's speed and kinetic energy can be determined using conservation of momentum, rather than assuming equal kinetic energy for both fragments. The assumption that kinetic energy is divided equally is flawed because the explosion applies forces differently to each fragment. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using momentum conservation in solving such problems. Understanding the dynamics of the explosion is crucial for accurate calculations.
God64bit
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A stationary object explodes into two fragments. A 4.0 kg fragment moves westward at 3.0 m/s. What are the speed and kinetic energy of the remaining 2.0 kg fragment?
why can't i assume the kinect enegery of each object is the same?I loked at it and assumed 1/2mv^2 for object 1 should equal object 2 subsituded numbers got 18J=1/2 2 v^2

but the answer says its 36J's
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A better question to ask is "why did I assume kinetic energy is divided equally?". Try to think about the explosion. The explosion forces the pieces away. You may assume that the force on both pieces is the same. How long does the force act on each particle, and how far does it act?
 
Thanks

thats simple enough the t part for how long the force was acting... :P
ill just solve it with momentum.
 
If you solve this with conservation of momentum, you can figure out the problem. I've come to realize that solving things with conservation of momentum is a better way to start in these sort of macro-classical mechanic problems.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top