What can we determine about the electric field lines from two charges Q1 and Q2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining characteristics of electric field lines from two charges, Q1 and Q2. It is established that both charges cannot have the same sign, as indicated by the behavior of the electric field lines, which would diverge if they did. The possibility of the electric field being zero at points P1 and P2 is explored, with the conclusion that at P2, the fields from Q1 and Q2 can cancel each other out. The application of Gauss's law supports the idea that field lines are reabsorbed, confirming that B is incorrect. Ultimately, the analysis leads to the understanding that the electric field can indeed be zero at certain points depending on the configuration of the charges.
jra_1574
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone!
i need some guide and hints about this...
Here is the link for the picture...

aaaaaaaa.jpg


From the figure, the electric Field lines arising from two charges Q1 and Q2 are shown. From this drawing we can see that
A) The electric field could be zero at P2
B) Both Q1 and Q2 have the same sign
C) |Q1|>|Q2|
D) the electric field could be zero at P1
E) none of these is true


Something is telling me that B is not true... why?
the lines go from one to the other, if they were from the same sign the lines would go apart from one another...now C... we can't tell because we don't know which one is proton and which is the electron. Choice E i don't think so..
So it must be either A or D, but i don't know which one and why...
can anyone help me here please?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree, B is not true. If the system contained a net charge- then there would be field lines that 'escape' from the 2 charges, whereas you can see that every field line is reabsorbed (Gauss's law).
 
can anyone give me a hint?
 
Assume one of them to be positive and the other, negative (since B is incorrect and none of them is zero charged). At P1 their fields add up, while at P2 they oppose each other. So, for some point lying in the region of P2, E will be zero.
 
Thanks for your Help!
I really appreciate it
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top