What can we determine about the electric field lines from two charges Q1 and Q2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining characteristics of electric field lines from two charges, Q1 and Q2. It is established that both charges cannot have the same sign, as indicated by the behavior of the electric field lines, which would diverge if they did. The possibility of the electric field being zero at points P1 and P2 is explored, with the conclusion that at P2, the fields from Q1 and Q2 can cancel each other out. The application of Gauss's law supports the idea that field lines are reabsorbed, confirming that B is incorrect. Ultimately, the analysis leads to the understanding that the electric field can indeed be zero at certain points depending on the configuration of the charges.
jra_1574
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone!
i need some guide and hints about this...
Here is the link for the picture...

aaaaaaaa.jpg


From the figure, the electric Field lines arising from two charges Q1 and Q2 are shown. From this drawing we can see that
A) The electric field could be zero at P2
B) Both Q1 and Q2 have the same sign
C) |Q1|>|Q2|
D) the electric field could be zero at P1
E) none of these is true


Something is telling me that B is not true... why?
the lines go from one to the other, if they were from the same sign the lines would go apart from one another...now C... we can't tell because we don't know which one is proton and which is the electron. Choice E i don't think so..
So it must be either A or D, but i don't know which one and why...
can anyone help me here please?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree, B is not true. If the system contained a net charge- then there would be field lines that 'escape' from the 2 charges, whereas you can see that every field line is reabsorbed (Gauss's law).
 
can anyone give me a hint?
 
Assume one of them to be positive and the other, negative (since B is incorrect and none of them is zero charged). At P1 their fields add up, while at P2 they oppose each other. So, for some point lying in the region of P2, E will be zero.
 
Thanks for your Help!
I really appreciate it
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top